Cited by 723Nursing education and managementPatient Safety and Medication ErrorsHealthcare Education and Workforce Issues

The Impact of Nursing Work Environments on Patient Safety Outcomes: The Mediating Role of Burnout Engagement

Spence Laschinger, Heather K., Leiter, Michael P.·2006·JONA: The Journal of Nursing Administration

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To test a theoretical model of professional nurse work environments linking conditions for professional nursing practice to burnout and, subsequently, patient safety outcomes. BACKGROUND: The 2004 Institute of Medicine report raised serious concerns about the impact of hospital restructuring on nursing work environments and patient safety outcomes. Few studies have used a theoretical framework to study the nature of the relationships between nursing work environments and patient safety outcomes. METHODS: Hospital-based nurses in Canada (N = 8,597) completed measures of worklife (Practice Environment Scale of the Nursing Work Index), burnout (Maslach Burnout Inventory-Human Service Scale), and their report of frequency of adverse patient events. RESULTS: Structural equation modeling analysis supported an extension of Leiter and Laschinger's Nursing Worklife Model. Nursing leadership played a fundamental role in the quality of worklife regarding policy involvement, staffing levels, support for a nursing model of care (vs medical), and nurse/physician relationships. Staffing adequacy directly affected emotional exhaustion, and use of a nursing model of care had a direct effect on nurses' personal accomplishment. Both directly affected patient safety outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that patient safety outcomes are related to the quality of the nursing practice work environment and nursing leadership's role in changing the work environment to decrease nurse burnout.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00005110-200605000-00019

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Positive nurse-physician collaborations predict Personal Accomplishment.

    “Leiter and Laschinger, who found that positive nurse-physician collaborations predicted Personal Accomplishment [57, 85]”

    From Burnout in nursing: a theoretical review. (2020) · cites this paper as [85]

  • Effective leadership predicts staffing adequacy, which in turn predicts Emotional Exhaustion.

    “Effective leadership predicted staffing adequacy, which in turn predicted Emotional Exhaustion [57, 85]”

    From Burnout in nursing: a theoretical review. (2020) · cites this paper as [85]

  • Having the opportunity to participate in policy decisions is associated with reduced burnout on all subscales.

    “Two studies on the same sample found that having the opportunity to participate in policy decisions was associated with reduced burnout (all subscales) [57, 85]”

    From Burnout in nursing: a theoretical review. (2020) · cites this paper as [85]

  • When the hospital adopts nursing models of care rather than medical models of care, nurses are more likely to report high levels of Personal Accomplishment.

    “When the hospital adopted nursing models of care rather than medical models of care, nurses were more likely to report high levels of Personal Accomplishment [57, 85]”

    From Burnout in nursing: a theoretical review. (2020) · cites this paper as [85]

  • High Depersonalisation and low Personal Accomplishment predict a higher rate of adverse events.

    “high DEP and low Personal Accomplishment predicted a higher rate of adverse events [85]”

    From Burnout in nursing: a theoretical review. (2020) · cites this paper as [85]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Spence Laschinger, H. K., & Leiter, M. P.
Affiliations
Western University (CA)
Venue
JONA: The Journal of Nursing Administration
Published
2006-05
Volume
36
Issue
5
Pages
259-267
ISSN
0002-0443 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2049298932
Cited by
723
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 45 · 2019: 40 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 59 · 2016: 60 · 2015: 55 · 2014: 55 · 2013: 43 · 2012: 51
FWCI
55.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • JONA The Journal of Nursing Administration (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion)
Funders
U.S. Public Health Service (NRO4513)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Nursing education and management
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Patient Safety and Medication Errors
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Leadership and Management › Healthcare Education and Workforce Issues
Keywords
nursing work environment, patient safety, nurse burnout, emotional exhaustion, nursing leadership, staffing adequacy, nurse-physician relationship, adverse patient events, hospital restructuring, personal accomplishment
MeSH terms
Adult, Alberta, Burnout, Professional, Cross-Sectional Studies, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Female, Health Facility Environment, Hospital Restructuring, Humans, Iatrogenic Disease, Leadership, Male, Middle Aged, Models, Theoretical, Nursing Staff, Hospital, Ontario, Personnel Staffing and Scheduling, Models, Nursing, Safety Management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review