The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Hospital Nurses' Perceptions of the Ethical Climate of Their Work Setting
Open accessAbstract
Purpose: To develop an instrument to measure how hospital nurses perceive the ethical climate of their work setting and to evaluate its psychometric properties. A way to measure ethical climate can help nurses understand the work setting influences on their practice and can be used to diagnose areas for organizational change as well as to evaluate effectiveness of organizational interventions. Design: Descriptive. Instrument developed was the Hospital Ethical Climate Survey (HECS). Sampled were 360 RNs (48% response rate) employed in clinical practice at two acute‐care hospitals in one U.S. midwestern city. The nurses completed a questionnaire in 1993–1994 consisting of items developed to assess their perceptions of ethical climate, along with the 43‐item Integrity Audit, a social desirability scale, and a demographic inventory. Methods: Construct validity was assessed by confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) using the LISREL®7 statisticaI program. Results: The final CFA model consisted of 26 variables in five factors, which were organized according to the relationships of nurses with peers, patients, managers, hospital, and physicians. Internal consistency reliability, using Cronbach's alpha, for the final 26‐item instrument was 0.91 (range 0.68 to 0.92) for the subscales. Conclusions: The Hospital Ethical Climate Survey has acceptable initial reliability and validity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Determination and Quantification Of Content Validity
LYNN, M. R. (1986) · Nursing Research · doi:10.1097/00006199-198611000-00017 · Cited by 6,775
Cited by
Nurse Moral Distress: a proposed theory and research agenda
Corley, M. C. (2002) · Nursing Ethics · doi:10.1191/0969733002ne557oa · Cited by 735
Development and Testing of an Instrument to Measure Moral Distress in Healthcare Professionals
Hamric, A. B., Borchers, C. T., & Epstein, E. G. (2012) · AJOB Primary Research · doi:10.1080/21507716.2011.652337 · Cited by 623
Nurse Moral Distress and Ethical Work Environment
Corley, M. C., Minick, P., Elswick, R. K., & Jacobs, M. (2005) · Nursing Ethics · doi:10.1191/0969733005ne809oa · Cited by 593
Epstein, E. G., Whitehead, P. B., Prompahakul, C., Thacker, L. R., & Hamric, A. B. (2019) · AJOB Empirical Bioethics · doi:10.1080/23294515.2019.1586008 · Cited by 580
Lamiani, G., Borghi, L., & Argentero, P. (2017) · Journal of Health Psychology · doi:10.1177/1359105315595120 · Cited by 522
Metadata
- Authors
- Olson, L. L.
- Venue
- Image: the Journal of Nursing Scholarship
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1998-12
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 345-349
- ISSN
- 0363-2792 (ISSN-L)
- 0743-5150
- OpenAlex
- W2140484242
- Cited by
- 333
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 2.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Hospital Nurses' Perceptions of the Ethical Climate of Their Work Setting. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1547-5069.1998.tb01331.x
- The paper
- Olson, L. L. (1998). Hospital Nurses' Perceptions of the Ethical Climate of Their Work Setting. Image: the Journal of Nursing Scholarship. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1547-5069.1998.tb01331.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.