The DOI matches its Crossref record; 68 of the 68 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
When healthcare professionals cannot do the right thing: A systematic review of moral distress and its correlates
Abstract
Moral distress occurs when professionals cannot carry out what they believe to be ethically appropriate actions. This review describes the publication trend on moral distress and explores its relationships with other constructs. A bibliometric analysis revealed that since 1984, 239 articles were published, with an increase after 2011. Most of them (71%) focused on nursing. Of the 239 articles, 17 empirical studies were systematically analyzed. Moral distress correlated with organizational environment (poor ethical climate and collaboration), professional attitudes (low work satisfaction and engagement), and psychological characteristics (low psychological empowerment and autonomy). Findings revealed that moral distress negatively affects clinicians’ wellbeing and job retention. Further studies should investigate protective psychological factors to develop preventive interventions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions: Cochrane Book Series
(2008) · doi:10.1002/9780470712184 · Cited by 25,048
(1996) · Consulting Psychologists Press eBooks · Cited by 7,863
PSYCHOLOGICAL, EMPOWERMENT IN THE WORKPLACE: DIMENSIONS, MEASUREMENT AND VALIDATION.
Spreitzer, G. M. (1995) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/256865 · Cited by 7,383
Systematic reviews in the social sciences: a practical guide
(2006) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.43-5664 · Cited by 4,089
Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences: A Practical Guide
Petticrew, M., & Roberts, H. (2006) · doi:10.1002/9780470754887 · Cited by 3,586
Defining and Assessing Professional Competence
Epstein, R. M. (2002) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.287.2.226 · Cited by 3,107
Development of the practice environment scale of the nursing work index†‡
Lake, E. T. (2002) · Research in Nursing & Health · doi:10.1002/nur.10032 · Cited by 1,769
Medical Professionalism in the New Millennium: A Physician Charter
Project of the ABIM Foundation, A. F. (2002) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-136-3-200202050-00012 · Cited by 1,624
Nursing practice, the ethical issues
(1985) · International Journal of Nursing Studies · doi:10.1016/0020-7489(85)90057-4 · Cited by 1,476
Moral Distress, Moral Residue, and the Crescendo Effect
Epstein, E. G., & Hamric, A. B. (2009) · The Journal of Clinical Ethics · doi:10.1086/jce200920406 · Cited by 909
Cited by
Addressing the mental health impact of COVID-19 through population health
Boden, M., Zimmerman, L., Azevedo, K. J., Ruzek, J. I., Gala, S., Abdel Magid, H. S., Cohen, N., Walser, R., Mahtani, N. D., Hoggatt, K. J., et al. (2021) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2021.102006 · Cited by 216
Lentz, L. M., Smith-MacDonald, L., Malloy, D., Carleton, R. N., & Brémault-Phillips, S. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.639781 · Cited by 143
Xue, Y., Lopes, J., Ritchie, K., D’Alessandro, A. M., Banfield, L., McCabe, R. E., Heber, A., Lanius, R. A., & McKinnon, M. C. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2022.863232 · Cited by 62
Webber, J., Trothen, T. J., Finlayson, M., & Norman, K. E. (2022) · Health & Social Care in the Community · doi:10.1111/hsc.13592 · Cited by 15
Metadata
- Authors
- Lamiani, G., Borghi, L., & Argentero, P.
- Venue
- Journal of Health Psychology
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2016-07-10
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 51-67
- ISSN
- 1359-1053 (ISSN-L)
- 1461-7277
- OpenAlex
- W1686576881
- Cited by
- 522
- References
- 68
- FWCI
- 3.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: When healthcare professionals cannot do the right thing: A systematic review of moral distress and its correlates. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/1359105315595120
- The paper
- Lamiani, G., Borghi, L., & Argentero, P. (2017). When healthcare professionals cannot do the right thing: A systematic review of moral distress and its correlates. Journal of Health Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105315595120
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
