The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Hospital Ethical Climates and Registered Nurses' Turnover Intentions
Abstract
Purpose : To investigate (a) the effects of hospital ethical climates on positional and professional turnover intentions of registered nurses, and (b) the relationships among demographic factors, employment characteristics, and positional and professional turnover intentions of registered nurses. Design : A cross‐sectional study of randomly selected registered nurses (n=463) in Missouri, USA, conducted in 2003 and 2004. Methods : A self‐administered questionnaire containing the Hospital Ethical Climate Survey, the Anticipated Turnover Scale, and the Nursing Retention Index was used to assess registered nurses' perceptions of the hospital ethical climate and their intentions to leave their position or the nursing profession. Descriptive statistics, Pearson product‐moment correlations, and hierarchical regression techniques were used to analyze the data. Findings : The hospital ethical climate explained 25.4% of the variance in positional turnover intentions and 14.7% of the variance in professional turnover intentions. Together, hospital ethical climate, control over practice, the use of educational reimbursement as a retention strategy, gender, and staff sufficiency explained 29.7% of the variance in positional turnover intentions. Hospital ethical climate, patient load, and control over practice together explained 15.8% of the variance in professional turnover intentions. Conclusions : Of the variables included in this analysis, the hospital ethical climate was most important in explaining nurses' positional and professional turnover intentions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hospital Nurse Staffing and Patient Mortality, Nurse Burnout, and Job Dissatisfaction
Aiken, L. H. (2002) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.288.16.1987 · Cited by 5,226
Cited by
Registered Nurses’ Perceptions of Moral Distress and Ethical Climate
Pauly, B., Varcoe, C., Storch, J., & Newton, L. (2009) · Nursing Ethics · doi:10.1177/0969733009106649 · Cited by 401
Halter, M., Boiko, O., Pelone, F., Beighton, C., Harris, R., Gale, J., Gourlay, S., & Drennan, V. (2017) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/s12913-017-2707-0 · Cited by 366
Ulrich, C., O’Donnell, P., Taylor, C., Farrar, A., Danis, M., & Grady, C. (2007) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.05.050 · Cited by 354
Almalki, M. J., FitzGerald, G., & Clark, M. (2012) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/1472-6963-12-314 · Cited by 297
Occupational Stress and Turnover Intention: Implications for Nursing Management
Mosadeghrad, A. M. (2013) · International Journal of Health Policy and Management · doi:10.15171/ijhpm.2013.30 · Cited by 269
Metadata
- Authors
- Hart, S. E.
- Venue
- Journal of Nursing Scholarship
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-05-11
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 173-177
- ISSN
- 0363-2792 (ISSN-L)
- 1527-6546
- 1547-5069
- OpenAlex
- W1977050758
- Cited by
- 255
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 18.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Hospital Ethical Climates and Registered Nurses' Turnover Intentions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1547-5069.2005.00030.x
- The paper
- Hart, S. E. (2005). Hospital Ethical Climates and Registered Nurses' Turnover Intentions. Journal of Nursing Scholarship. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1547-5069.2005.00030.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.