Cited by 157Patient Safety and Medication ErrorsClinical Reasoning and Diagnostic SkillsNursing education and management

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Nurses' Reported Thinking During Medication Administration

Eisenhauer, Laurel A., Hurley, Ann C., Dolan, Nancy·2007·Journal of Nursing Scholarship

Abstract

Purpose To document nurses' reported thinking processes during medication administration before and after implementation of point-of-care technology. Design and methods Semistructured interviews and real-time tape recordings were used to document the thinking processes of 40 nurses practicing in inpatient care units in a large tertiary care teaching hospital in the northeastern US. Findings Content analysis resulted in identification of 10 descriptive categories of nurses' thinking: communication, dose-time, checking, assessment, evaluation, teaching, side effects, work arounds, anticipating problem solving, and drug administration. Situations requiring judgment in dosage, timing, or selection of specific medications (e.g., pain management, titration of antihypertensives) provided the most explicit data about nurses' use of critical thinking and clinical judgment. A key element was nurses' constant professional vigilance to ensure that patients received their appropriate medications. Conclusions Nurses' thinking processes extended beyond rules and procedures and were based on patient data and interdisciplinary professional knowledge to provide safe and effective care. Identification of thinking processes can help nurses to explain the professional expertise inherent in medication administration beyond the technical application of the "5 rights."

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1547-5069.2007.00148.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. Eisenhauer L., 1998, Clinical pharmacology and nursing management
  2. 10.1002/nur.1017 · DOI
  3. 10.1001/jama.1995.03530010049034 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2004.03091.x · DOI
  5. 10.1111/j.1442-2018.2004.00178.x · DOI
  6. Meyer G., 2005, Vigilance: The essence of nursing, Online Journal of Issues in Nursing
  7. Miles M.B., 1994, Qualitative data analysis
  8. 10.1037/h0043158 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Morse J.M., 1987, Nursing research: Methodological issues, 181
  10. Turner P., 2005, Critical thinking in nursing education and practice as defined in the literature, Nursing Education Perspectives, 26, 272
  11. 10.1097/00006223-200407000-00001 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 157

Metadata

Authors
Eisenhauer, L. A., Hurley, A. C., & Dolan, N.
Affiliations
Boston College (US)
Corresponding author
  • Eisenhauer, Laurel A.
  • Hurley, Ann C.
  • Dolan, Nancy
Venue
Journal of Nursing Scholarship
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-02-26
Volume
39
Issue
1
Pages
82-87
ISSN
  • 0363-2792 (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-6546
  • 1547-5069
OpenAlex
W2128050536
Cited by
157
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 11
FWCI
18.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Nursing Scholarship (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Patient Safety and Medication Errors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Nursing education and management
Keywords
medication administration, point-of-care technology, critical thinking, clinical judgment, nursing expertise, drug safety, inpatient nursing
MeSH terms
Adult, Attitude of Health Personnel, Clinical Competence, Communication, Drug Therapy, Female, Hospitals, Teaching, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Male, Medication Errors, Medication Systems, Hospital, Middle Aged, New England, Nursing Assessment, Nursing Process, Nursing Staff, Hospital, Patient Education as Topic, Problem Solving, Surveys and Questionnaires, Thinking, Nursing Methodology Research, Safety Management, Point-of-Care Systems, Nurse's Role

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nurses' Reported Thinking During Medication Administration. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1547-5069.2007.00148.x
The paper
Eisenhauer, L. A., Hurley, A. C., & Dolan, N. (2007). Nurses' Reported Thinking During Medication Administration. Journal of Nursing Scholarship. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1547-5069.2007.00148.x