CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 217Health Policy Implementation ScienceHealth Sciences Research and EducationClinical practice guidelines implementation

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 47 of the 47 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Nursing Implementation Science: How Evidence‐Based Nursing Requires Evidence‐Based Implementation

Van Achterberg, Theo, Schoonhoven, Lisette, Grol, Richard·2008·Journal of Nursing Scholarship
DOI 10.1111/j.1547-5069.2008.00243.x
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Purpose: Evidence is not always used in practice, and many examples of problematic implementation of research into practice exist. The aim of this paper is to provide an introduction and overview of current developments in implementation science and to apply these to nursing. Methods: We discuss a framework for implementation, describe common implementation determinants, and provide a rationale for choosing implementation strategies using the available evidence from nursing research and general health services research. Findings: Common determinants for implementation relate to knowledge, cognitions, attitudes, routines, social influence, organization, and resources. Determinants are often specific for innovation, context, and target groups. Strategies focused on individual professionals and voluntary approaches currently dominate implementation research. Strategies such as reminders, decision support, use of information and communication technology (ICT), rewards, and combined strategies are often effective in encouraging implementation of evidence and innovations. Linking determinants to theory‐based strategies, however, can facilitate optimal implementation plans. Conclusions: An analytical, deliberate process of clarifying implementation determinants and choosing strategies is needed to improve situations where suboptimal care exists. Use of theory and evidence from implementation science can facilitate evidence‐based implementation. More research, especially in the area of nursing, is needed. This research should be focused on the effectiveness of innovative strategies directed to patients, individual professionals, teams, healthcare organizations, and finances. Clinical Relevance: Implementation of evidence‐based interventions is crucial to professional nursing and the quality and safety of patient care.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1547-5069.2008.00243.x

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 47 references

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Halfens R, 2003, Verpleging en verzorging [State of the art studies]
  2. 2002, Toolkit: Implementation of clinical practice guidelines
  3. Rogers E.M., 1983, Diffusion of innovations
  4. Van Woerkom C, 1990, Voorlichting als beleidsinstrument [Education as a policy tool]
  5. Vermeulen H., 2007, Nuchtere kijk op de nuchtere maag: Onderzoek naar kennis nuchterbeleid voor OK, Nursing, 14, 20

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 217

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Van Achterberg, T., Schoonhoven, L., & Grol, R.
Affiliations
Radboud University Medical Center (NL)
Corresponding author
  • Schoonhoven, Lisette
  • Grol, Richard
ORCID
Schoonhoven, Lisette
Venue
Journal of Nursing Scholarship
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-11-25
Volume
40
Issue
4
Pages
302-310
ISSN
  • 0363-2792 (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-6546
  • 1547-5069
DOI
10.1111/j.1547-5069.2008.00243.x
OpenAlex
W2017533262
Cited by
217
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 27
FWCI
22.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor)
Locations
  • Journal of Nursing Scholarship (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (acceptedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Sciences Research and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Clinical practice guidelines implementation
Keywords
implementation science, evidence-based nursing, implementation factors, implementation strategies, research utilization, implementation barriers, decision support, information and communication technologies, organizational factors
MeSH terms
Diffusion of Innovation, Quality of Health Care, Evidence-Based Nursing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review