Cited by 86

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Anthropology as White Public Space?

Brodkin, Karen, Morgen, Sandra, Hutchinson, Janis·2011·American Anthropologist

Abstract

ABSTRACT How far has anthropology come in becoming racially inclusive? In this article, we analyze an online survey of anthropology graduate students and faculty of color undertaken by the AAA Commission on Race and Racism in Anthropology. Despite some progress, institutional and attitudinal barriers remain. We use the concept of “white public space” to analyze these barriers: departmental labor is divided in ways that assign to faculty and graduate students of color responsibilities that have lower status and rewards than those of their white counterparts. Colorblind racial explanatory practices—discourses that explain away racially unequal institutional practices as being “not about race”—are common. We argue that such practices make many anthropology departments feel like white‐owned social and intellectual spaces. We conclude by suggesting steps with which anthropology departments can create more inclusive social spaces that are owned equally by scholars of color and their white peers.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1548-1433.2011.01368.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The discipline of anthropology, at the undergraduate, doctoral, and professional levels, continues to exist as a white public space.

    “the discipline-at the undergraduate, doctoral, and professional levels-continues to exist as a white public space (Brodkin, Morgan, and Hutchinson 2011)”

    From (Re)Writing Anthropology and Raising Our Voices from the Academic Margins (2022) · cites this paper as Brodkin, Morgan, and Hutchinson 2011

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 30

  1. American Anthropological Association (AAA), 1977, Report of the 1977 Survey of Departments
  2. American Anthropological Association (AAA), 1995, Survey of Ph.D. Recipients
  3. American Anthropological Association (AAA), 1996, Biennial Survey of Anthropology Departments in the United States
  4. American Anthropological Association (AAA), 1997, Survey of Anthropology Ph.D.s
  5. American Anthropological Association (AAA), 1999, Biennial Survey of Anthropology Departments in the United States
  6. 10.1525/9780520920194 · DOI
  7. Bolles A. Lynn, 2001, Black Feminist Anthropology, 24
  8. Bonilla Silva Eduardo, 2006, Racism without Racists: Color‐Blind Racism and the Persistence of Racial Inequality in the United States
  9. Carter Susan B., 1981, Feminist Studies, 477
  10. Committee on Minorities and Anthropology (CMA), 1973, Report of the Committee on Minorities and Anthropology
  11. Davalos Karen Mary, 1998, Anthropology and Chicana/o Studies: The Conversation That Never Was, Aztlan, 23, 13
  12. 10.1177/048661348501700306 · DOI
  13. 10.1215/9780822383109 · DOI
  14. Faye Harrison, 1997, Decolonizing Anthropology: Moving Further Toward an Anthropology for Liberation
  15. Leap William, 1999, Final Report of the Commission on Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgendered Issues in Anthropology
  16. MacLean Nancy, 2006, Freedom Is Not Enough: The Opening of the American Workplace
  17. Morgen Sandra, 1989, Gender and Anthropology: Critical Reviews for Research and Teaching
  18. 10.1525/aa.1997.99.3.517 · DOI
  19. 10.1146/annurev.anthro.32.061002.093435 · DOI
  20. 10.1525/maq.1994.8.1.02a00120 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Rudd Elizabeth, 2008, Social Science Ph.D.s Five+ Years Out: Anthropology Report
  22. 10.1525/aa.1998.100.3.669 · DOI
  23. Smith Daryl, 2009, Diversity's Promise for Higher Education: Making It Work
  24. 10.1111/j.1548-1492.2008.00020.x · DOI
  25. 10.1525/napa.2006.25.1.176 · DOI
  26. 10.1525/aa.2004.106.3.435 · DOI
  27. 10.1525/aeq.2007.38.3.209 · DOI
  28. 10.1111/j.1548-1492.2010.01084.x · DOI
  29. 10.1111/j.1548-1387.2008.00002.x · DOI
  30. 10.1111/j.1548-1433.2009.01076.x · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Brodkin, K., Morgen, S., & Hutchinson, J.
Venue
American Anthropologist
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-11-25
Volume
113
Issue
4
Pages
545-556
ISSN
  • 0002-7294
  • 1548-1433
Cited by
86
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review