Cited by 3Anthropology: Ethics, History, CultureAnthropological Studies and InsightsDecolonial Thought and Epistemologies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 13 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.

(Re)Writing Anthropology and Raising Our Voices from the Academic Margins

Open access
McKinson, Kimberley·2022·Cultural Anthropology

Abstract

In reframing the ontological limits and possibilities of the academic margin, this Colloquy situates the Minority Serving Institution (MSI) classroom as a critical (field) site in which anthropological knowledge is innovated, produced, and contested. The essays, written by anthropologists who work in and represent “non-hegemonic” institutions, speak to decolonial, Black feminist, and liberatory projects and pedagogy that challenge what anthropology can look like, how anthropology can be practiced, how it can be taught, and what it can contribute to a more just world. This collection crafts a vision for an equitable anthropology of the now and the future and situates the academic margins as an important space from which the discipline must be reimagined in the current political moment.

Overview

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This Colloquy introduction argues that Minority Serving Institutions (MSIs) and their classrooms should be treated as a critical field site from which anthropology can be rewritten, not merely as a site of exclusion. It frames the MSI academic margin as a productive, empowering space for decolonial, Black feminist, and liberatory pedagogy.

Key findings

The essay is a framing introduction rather than an empirical study, so its claims are programmatic. It reports that HBCUs represent just 3 percent of all colleges and universities but enroll 11 percent of African American students; TCUs represent less than 1 percent of institutions but enroll 9 percent of Native American students; HSIs represent only 4 percent of tertiary institutions but enroll 50 percent of all Latino students; and AANAPISIs represent less than 1 percent of institutions but enroll 20 percent of all Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders. It also notes that 98 percent of African Americans and Native Americans attending HBCUs or TCUs qualify for federal need-based aid, and that more than half of all students at MSIs receive Pell Grants versus 31 percent of all college students. It argues anthropology "continues to exist as a white public space" despite progress toward racial inclusion.

Methods

This is a Colloquy introduction synthesizing four contributed essays (Jenks on archival practice; McKinson on auto-ethnography and photovoice; Williams on citation praxis at an HBCU; Trinch, Cassidy, Suazo, and Mallol Nunez on the *Seeing Rape* theater project). The essays originated from a roundtable during the AAA's 2020 Raising Our Voices virtual series featuring anthropologists at four-year MSIs designated as AANAPISIs, HBCUs, and HSIs. The introduction draws on cited scholarship (Harrison, Crenshaw, Tsing, Lamphere, Dominguez, hooks) and MSI enrollment statistics to frame the collection.

Limitations

The paper states that essays showcasing two-year (community college) institutions and four-year Alaska Native-Serving Institutions, Native American-Serving Non-Tribal Institutions, Native Hawaiian-Serving Institutions, PBIs, and TCUs are absent from the collection, though these institutions "undoubtedly also sit at the academic margins" and face a "double marginalization." Evident from the text: the introduction offers no original empirical data of its own, relying on cited statistics and the contributed essays, and its claims about pedagogical transformation are asserted rather than tested.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.14506/ca37.3.01

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

0 of 13 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Premisecitation
    § ANTHROPOLOGY AND RAISING OUR VOICES FROM THE ACADEMIC MARGINS CULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY

    The discipline of anthropology, at the undergraduate, doctoral, and professional levels, continues to exist as a white public space.

    “the discipline-at the undergraduate, doctoral, and professional levels-continues to exist as a white public space (Brodkin, Morgan, and Hutchinson 2011)”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Brodkin, Morgan, and Hutchinson 2011 source
  • Premisenone given
    § ANTHROPOLOGY AND RAISING OUR VOICES FROM THE ACADEMIC MARGINS CULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY

    MSIs provide intellectual homes for many low-income students whose lives intersect with deep histories of racism and poverty.

    “These institutions also provide intellectual homes for many low-income students whose lives intersect with deep histories of racism and poverty.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Premisecitation
    § ANTHROPOLOGY AND RAISING OUR VOICES FROM THE ACADEMIC MARGINS CULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY

    A significant number of anthropologists have theorized the positionality of the margins in relation to state power.

    “A significant number of anthropologists have theorized the positionality of the margins in relation to state power (Das and Poole 2004).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Das and Poole 2004

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Interpretationcitation
    § ANTHROPOLOGY AND RAISING OUR VOICES FROM THE ACADEMIC MARGINS CULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY

    The margin has the potential to disrupt and transform the oppressive social categories that operate as intersecting systems of power.

    “we must also recognize the margin for its potential to disrupt and transform the oppressive social categories that operate as intersecting systems of power (Crenshaw 1991)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Crenshaw 1991 source

      A check is scheduled.

  • Premisecitation
    § ANTHROPOLOGY AND RAISING OUR VOICES FROM THE ACADEMIC MARGINS CULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY

    MSIs enroll a significant number of students for whom higher education might otherwise have remained a foreclosed dream.

    “Put simply, MSIs enroll a significant number of students for whom higher education might otherwise have remained a foreclosed dream (Gasman and Conrad 2013).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Gasman and Conrad 2013
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 15
  • It may state two separate claims as one. 10
  • Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § ANTHROPOLOGY AND RAISING OUR VOICES FROM THE ACADEMIC MARGINS CULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY

    The post-George Floyd world demands a willingness to seriously look to the MSI classroom as a space generative of the critical anthropological pedagogy and knowledge that the present moment demands.

    “The authors fundamentally recognize that the post-George Floyd world that we now inhabit demands a willingness to seriously look to the MSI classroom as a space generative of the critical anthropological pedagogy and knowledge that the present moment demands.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationnone given
    § ANTHROPOLOGY AND RAISING OUR VOICES FROM THE ACADEMIC MARGINS CULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY

    Anthropologists have neglected to come to terms with the reinscription of the center/margin dichotomy at home, in the universities and colleges where academic anthropologists write anthropology and teach and learn it with their students; this neglect is a noteworthy blind spot and disciplinary zone of discomfort.

    “The failure of anthropologists to effectively consider the institutional and pedagogical operationalization of the margin within the center represents a noteworthy blind spot and disciplinary zone of discomfort.”
    • Also stated in: § ANTHROPOLOGY AND RAISING OUR VOICES FROM THE ACADEMIC MARGINS CULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY · plain
      “anthropologists have neglected to come to terms with the reinscription of the center/margin dichotomy at home, specifically, at the very places-universities and collegeswhere academic anthropologists write anthropology and where, with their students, they perform the sacred and foundational acts of teaching and learning anthropology.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § ANTHROPOLOGY AND RAISING OUR VOICES FROM THE ACADEMIC MARGINS CULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY

    The innovative pedagogical strategies presented in the essays have the potential to disrupt the hegemony of cultural anthropology and to be put into practice across anthropology's subfields.

    “we must understand their interventions more broadly, that is, in relation to the potential for these innovative pedagogical strategies to disrupt the hegemony of cultural anthropology and be put into practice across anthropology's subfields.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisecitation
    § ANTHROPOLOGY AND RAISING OUR VOICES FROM THE ACADEMIC MARGINS CULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY

    Anthropologists have written about the politics of doing ethnography at the margins.

    “Anthropologists have written about the politics of doing ethnography at the margins (Herzfeld 1987;Bošković 2008).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Herzfeld 1987

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Bošković 2008
  • Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § ANTHROPOLOGY AND RAISING OUR VOICES FROM THE ACADEMIC MARGINS CULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY

    The essays illuminate the need for greater recognition of and scholarly engagement with a number of minority-serving institutions that face a double marginalization, being marginalized both within the larger academic sphere and within conversations about MSIs.

    “these essays, even as they highlight critical voices from the academic margins, also illuminate the need for greater recognition of and scholarly engagement with an important number of minority-serving institutions that reside at the academic margins-yet face a double marginalization.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § ANTHROPOLOGY AND RAISING OUR VOICES FROM THE ACADEMIC MARGINS CULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY

    The MSI academic margin constitutes a productive space from which to rewrite anthropology.

    “The essays demonstrate that the MSI academic margin in fact constitutes a productive space from which to rewrite anthropology.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § ANTHROPOLOGY AND RAISING OUR VOICES FROM THE ACADEMIC MARGINS CULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY

    The margin is not just a site of exclusion but also one of empowerment.

    “Such a reading highlights the margin as not just a site of exclusion but also as one of empowerment.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation
    § ANTHROPOLOGY AND RAISING OUR VOICES FROM THE ACADEMIC MARGINS CULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY

    The margin is an analytical placement that makes evident both the constraining, oppressive quality of cultural exclusion and the creative potential of rearticulating, enlivening, and rearranging the very social categories that peripheralize a group's existence.

    “the constraining, oppressive quality of cultural exclusion and the creative potential of rearticulating, enlivening, and rearranging the very social categories that peripheralize a group's existence”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Tsing 1994

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § ANTHROPOLOGY AND RAISING OUR VOICES FROM THE ACADEMIC MARGINS CULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY

    Anthropology is always plural and fractured, despite historical tendencies to suggest otherwise.

    “Such a philosophy highlights anthropology as always plural and fractured-despite historical tendencies to suggest otherwise.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § ANTHROPOLOGY AND RAISING OUR VOICES FROM THE ACADEMIC MARGINS CULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY

    Anthropologists who work at MSIs have a unique opportunity to expose minority students to the discipline and offer them a critical anthropological lens through which to understand their own experiences and the world around them.

    “anthropologists who work at MSIs have a unique opportunity to expose minority students to the discipline and offer to them a critical anthropological lens through which to understand their own experiences, as well as the world around them.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § ANTHROPOLOGY AND RAISING OUR VOICES FROM THE ACADEMIC MARGINS CULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY

    Anthropology is always in the process of becoming.

    “Such a reorientation recognizes anthropology as always in the process of becoming.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisecitation
    § ANTHROPOLOGY AND RAISING OUR VOICES FROM THE ACADEMIC MARGINS CULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY

    Scholars have sought to shed light on the marginalization and contributions of minority and women scholars in the discipline of anthropology.

    “Scholars have also sought to shed light on the marginalization and contributions of minority and women scholars in the discipline (Harrison and Harrison 1999;Harrison, Johnson-Simon, and Williams 2018;Lamphere 2004).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Harrison and Harrison 1999

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Harrison, Johnson-Simon, and Williams 2018 source
    • cites Lamphere 2004 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisenone given
    § ANTHROPOLOGY AND RAISING OUR VOICES FROM THE ACADEMIC MARGINS CULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY

    Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs) represent just 3 percent of all colleges and universities in the United States but enroll 11 percent of African American students.

    “while HBCUs represent just 3 percent of all colleges and universities, they enroll 11 percent of African American students”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisereasoning
    § ANTHROPOLOGY AND RAISING OUR VOICES FROM THE ACADEMIC MARGINS CULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY

    The eight federally designated types of MSIs all provide tertiary education opportunities to primarily low-income and underrepresented students of color neglected by an American higher education system that has traditionally privileged Predominantly White Institutions.

    “They all provide tertiary education opportunities to primarily low-income and underrepresented students of color neglected by an American higher education system that has traditionally privileged Predominantly White Institutions (PWIs).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisenone given
    § ANTHROPOLOGY AND RAISING OUR VOICES FROM THE ACADEMIC MARGINS CULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY

    Hispanic-Serving Institutions (HSIs) represent only 4 percent of tertiary institutions in the United States but enroll 50 percent of all Latino students.

    “while HSIs represent only 4 percent of tertiary institutions, they enroll 50 percent of all Latino students”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation
    § ANTHROPOLOGY AND RAISING OUR VOICES FROM THE ACADEMIC MARGINS CULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY

    More than half of all students enrolled at MSIs receive Pell Grants, compared with only 31 percent of all college students.

    “more than half of all students enrolled at MSIs receive Pell Grants, compared with only 31 percent of all college students (Rutgers Center for Minority Serving Institutions 2014)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Rutgers Center for Minority Serving Institutions 2014

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisenone given
    § ANTHROPOLOGY AND RAISING OUR VOICES FROM THE ACADEMIC MARGINS CULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY

    Tribal Colleges and Universities (TCUs) represent less than 1 percent of higher education institutions in the United States but enroll 9 percent of Native American students.

    “while TCUs represent less than 1 percent of higher education institutions, they enroll 9 percent of Native American students”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisenone given
    § ANTHROPOLOGY AND RAISING OUR VOICES FROM THE ACADEMIC MARGINS CULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY

    Asian American and Native American Pacific Islander-Serving Institutions (AANAPISIs) represent less than 1 percent of all colleges and universities in the United States but enroll 20 percent of all Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders.

    “while AANAPISIs represent less than 1 percent of all colleges and universities, they enroll 20 percent of all Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § ANTHROPOLOGY AND RAISING OUR VOICES FROM THE ACADEMIC MARGINS CULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY

    Rewriting anthropology from the academic margins is a political act rooted in pedagogical praxis that necessarily engages anthropology as an incomplete epistemological project and as unsettled terrain.

    “It is a political act rooted in pedagogical praxis that necessarily engages anthropology as an incomplete epistemological project and as unsettled terrain.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
19 of 19
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    In the United States, Minority Serving Institutions came into existence in response to historical inequities in minority access to higher education.

    “In the United States, MSIs came into existence in response to historical inequities in minority access to higher education.”
1 of 1

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 15 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Brown, Nina 2022 "The Diversity Slot: The Case for Letting Anthropology Burn at Community Colleges." In Applying Anthropology to General Education Reshaping Colleges and Universities for the Twenty-First Century, edited by Jennifer R. Wies and Hillary J. Haldane, 106-20. London: Routledge.
  2. McKinson, Kimberley D. 2020 "Dear White Anthropologists, Let Not Symbolism Overshadow Substance." Anthropology News, July 2. https://doi.org/10.14506/AN.1452 · DOI
  3. Tsing, Anna L. 1994 "From the Margins." Cultural Anthropology 9, no. 3: 279-97. https://www.jstor. org/stable/656363

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
McKinson, K.
Affiliations
Vanderbilt University (US)
Corresponding author
McKinson, Kimberley
Venue
Cultural Anthropology
Published
2022-08-18
Volume
37
Issue
3
ISSN
  • 0886-7356 (ISSN-L)
  • 1548-1360
OpenAlex
W4294957967
Cited by
2
References
15
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1
FWCI
1.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
Cultural Anthropology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Anthropology: Ethics, History, Culture
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Anthropological Studies and Insights
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Decolonial Thought and Epistemologies
Keywords
minority-serving institutions, decolonial anthropology, anthropology pedagogy, anthropology of the present, critical pedagogy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-11-10, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-11-10 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review