The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Race and Practice in Archaeological Interpretation by Charles E. Orser, Jr.
Abstract
Risk prediction models are used to determine eligibility for targeted lung cancer screening. However, prospective data regarding model performance in this setting are limited. Here we report the performance of the PLCOm2012 risk model, which calculates 6 year lung cancer risk, in a cohort invited for lung cancer screening in a socioeconomically deprived area.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Citations
Cites
Race and the Archaeology of Identity
Orser, C. E. (2001) · Cited by 198
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- York University Press, 2007., xii1282
Cited by
Still being checked.
Metadata
- Authors
- AGBE‐DAVIES, A. S.
- Affiliations
- DePaul University (US)
- Corresponding author
- AGBE‐DAVIES, ANNA S.
- Venue
- Transforming Anthropology
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 2009-10-01
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 159-160
- ISSN
- 1051-0559 (ISSN-L)
- 1548-7466
- OpenAlex
- W2116609854
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 1
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Transforming Anthropology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Historical and Cultural Archaeology Studies
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Race, Genetics, and Society
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology (arts and humanities) › Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies
- Keywords
- race, archaeological interpretation, racial classification, racial typology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
