The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Social Psychological and Structural Influences on Vegetarian Beliefs
Abstract
Abstract This study examines the link between social structural variables (gender, race, education, age, rural childhood), individual social psychology (altruism, self‐interest, traditionality, and openness to change), and beliefs about the benefits of vegetarianism (for health, the environment, animals, and world hunger) and self‐reported vegetarianism. Data from a random sample of 420 adult U.S. residents showed that 5.2 percent considered themselves vegetarian. The strongest predictor of vegetarianism as a dietary choice was the belief that vegetarianism is beneficial to the environment. None of the social structural variables had a direct influence on vegetarianism as a dietary choice. Of the four values studied, only altruism and traditional values influenced beliefs about the benefits of vegetarianism. Altruistic values increased, and traditional values decreased, beliefs that vegetarianism is beneficial to health, the environment, farm animals, and world hunger. Blacks were more likely than Whites to adhere to the beliefs that vegetarianism helps prevent cruelty to farm animals, is beneficial to personal health, and is beneficial to the environment. The race differences in beliefs persisted even with controls for values.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Schwartz, S. H. (1992) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60281-6 · Cited by 14,619
Value orientations, gender and environmental concern
Stern, P. C., Dietz, T., & Kalof, L. (1993) · Environment and Behavior · doi:10.1177/0013916593255002 · Cited by 2,162
Influences on Attitude-Behavior Relationships: A Natural Experiment with Curbside Recycling
Guagnano, G. A., Stern, P. C., & Dietz, T. (1995) · Environment and Behavior · doi:10.1177/0013916595275005 · Cited by 1,457
Self-citation
Cited by
Vegetarianism. A blossoming field of study
Ruby, M. B. (2012) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2011.09.019 · Cited by 887
Real men don’t eat (vegetable) quiche: Masculinity and the justification of meat consumption.
Rothgerber, H. (2013) · Psychology of Men & Masculinity · doi:10.1037/a0030379 · Cited by 566
Health, ethics and environment: A qualitative study of vegetarian motivations
Fox, N., & Ward, K. (2008) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2007.09.007 · Cited by 503
Australians' organic food beliefs, demographics and values
Lea, E., & Worsley, T. (2005) · British Food Journal · doi:10.1108/00070700510629797 · Cited by 493
Graça, J., Godinho, C. A., & Truninger, M. (2019) · Trends in Food Science & Technology · doi:10.1016/j.tifs.2019.07.046 · Cited by 447
Metadata
- Authors
- Kalof, L., Dietz, T., Stern, P. C., & Guagnano, G. A.
- Venue
- Rural Sociology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1999-09
- Volume
- 64
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 500-511
- ISSN
- 0036-0112 (ISSN-L)
- 1549-0831
- OpenAlex
- W2064664077
- Cited by
- 172
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 1.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Social Psychological and Structural Influences on Vegetarian Beliefs. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1549-0831.1999.tb00364.x
- The paper
- Kalof, L., Dietz, T., Stern, P. C., & Guagnano, G. A. (1999). Social Psychological and Structural Influences on Vegetarian Beliefs. Rural Sociology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1549-0831.1999.tb00364.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.