Cited by 483Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton DynamicsMarine and coastal ecosystemsMicrobial Community Ecology and Physiology

Algicidal Bacteria in the Sea and their Impact on Algal Blooms1

MAYALI, XAVIER, AZAM, FAROOQ·2004·Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology

Abstract

ABSTRACT. Over the past two decades, many reports have revealed the existence of bacteria capable of killing phytoplankton. These algicidal bacteria sometimes increase in abundance concurrently with the decline of algal blooms, suggesting that they may affect algal bloom dynamics. Here, we synthesize the existing knowledge on algicidal bacteria interactions with marine eukaryotic microalgae. We discuss the effectiveness of the current methods to characterize the algicidal phenotype in an ecosystem context. We briefly consider the literature on the phylogenetic identification of algicidal bacteria, their interaction with their algal prey, the characterization of algicidal molecules, and the enumeration of algicidal bacteria during algal blooms. We conclude that, due to limitations of current methods, the evidence for algicidal bacteria causing algal bloom decline is circumstantial. New methods and an ecosystem approach are needed to test hypotheses on the impact of algicidal bacteria in algal bloom dynamics. This will require enlarging the scope of inquiry from its current focus on the potential utility of algicidal bacteria in the control of harmful algal blooms. We suggest conceptualizing bacterial algicidy within the general problem of bacterial regulation of algal community structure in the ocean.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1550-7408.2004.tb00538.x

Cites

68 of 68 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Microalgal growth facilities can be an excellent habitat for undesirable guests, which in most cases are detrimental for algal growth by acting as competitors, parasites or predators.

    “Microalgal growth facilities can be an excellent habitat for a wide variety of undesirable guests. In most cases, these will be detrimental for algal growth by acting as competitors (other algae with low oil production or bacteria), parasites (virus, fungus or protozoans) or predators (protozoans, fungus or aquatic invertebrates [54–57].”

    From Biofuels from algae: Challenges and potential (2010) · cites this paper as [55]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
MAYALI, X., & AZAM, F.
Affiliations
Scripps Institution of Oceanography (US)
Corresponding author
MAYALI, XAVIER
Venue
Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-03
Volume
51
Issue
2
Pages
139-144
ISSN
  • 1066-5234 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-7408
OpenAlex
W2178958608
Cited by
483
References
68
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 36 · 2015: 29 · 2014: 32 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 19
FWCI
1.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • BioOne Complete (BioOne) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Marine and coastal ecosystems
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology
Keywords
algicidal bacteria, algal blooms, harmful algal blooms, phytoplankton, bloom decline, harmful algal bloom control, marine bacteria
MeSH terms
Antibiosis, Bacteria, Eutrophication, Marine Biology, Pest Control, Biological, Phytoplankton, Population Dynamics, Seawater, Water Microbiology, Ecosystem, Eukaryota

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review