CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1,680Protist diversity and phylogenyGenomics and Phylogenetic StudiesPlant Diversity and Evolution

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 212 of the 212 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Revised Classification of Eukaryotes

Open access
Adl, Sina M., Simpson, Alastair G. B., Lane, Christopher E., Lukeš, Julius, Bass, David, Bowser, Samuel S., Brown, Matthew W., Burki, Fabien, Dunthorn, Micah, Hampl, Vladimir, Heiss, Aaron, Hoppenrath, Mona, Lara, Enrique, le Gall, Line, Lynn, Denis H., McManus, Hilary, Mitchell, Edward A. D., Mozley‐Stanridge, Sharon E., Parfrey, Laura W., Pawlowski, Jan, Rueckert, Sonja, Shadwick, Laura, Schoch, Conrad L., Smirnov, Alexey, Spiegel, Frederick W.·2012·Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology
DOI 10.1111/j.1550-7408.2012.00644.xPMC PMC3483872
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

This revision of the classification of eukaryotes, which updates that of Adl et al. [ J. Eukaryot. Microbiol . 52 (2005) 399], retains an emphasis on the protists and incorporates changes since 2005 that have resolved nodes and branches in phylogenetic trees. Whereas the previous revision was successful in re‐introducing name stability to the classification, this revision provides a classification for lineages that were then still unresolved. The supergroups have withstood phylogenetic hypothesis testing with some modifications, but despite some progress, problematic nodes at the base of the eukaryotic tree still remain to be statistically resolved. Looking forward, subsequent transformations to our understanding of the diversity of life will be from the discovery of novel lineages in previously under‐sampled areas and from environmental genomic information.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1550-7408.2012.00644.x

Cites

212 of 212 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Items 201–212 of 212

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 24

  1. Pérez‐Cordón G., 2006, The confused taxonomy of Cryptosporidium, Rev. Per. Biol., 13, 143
  2. 10.1371/journal.pone.0018163 · DOI
  3. Jankowski A. W, 2007, Protista. Part 2, Handbook on Zoology, 415
  4. Meisterfeld R, 2002, The Illustrated Guide to the Protozoa, 1054
  5. 10.1111/j.1550-7408.2010.00477.x · DOI
  6. 10.1093/molbev/msl120 · DOI
  7. 10.1098/rspb.2008.1358 · DOI
  8. 10.1093/sysbio/syq037 · DOI
  9. 10.1073/pnas.0807880106 · DOI
  10. Couch J. N., 1962, Validation of the family Coelomomycetaceae and certain species and varieties of Coelomomyces, J. Elisha Mitchell Sci. Soc., 78, 135
  11. Doweld A. B, 2001, Prosyllabus Tracheophytorum. Tentamen Systematis Plantarum Vascularium (Tracheophyta)
  12. Fischer A, 1892, Phycomycetes. Die Pilze Deutschlands, Oestrerreichs und der Schweiz. Rabenhorst, Kryptoamen‐Fl., 1, 1
  13. 10.1080/15572536.2006.11832616 · DOI
  14. Kirk P. M., 2008, Dictionary of the Fungi
  15. Kirk P. M., 2001, Dictionary of the Fungi
  16. Korschikoff A. A., 1931, Notizen uber einige neue apochlorotische. Algen, Archiv Protistenkd., 74, 249
  17. Petersen H. E., 1909, Studier over Ferskvands‐Phykomyceter, Botanisk Tidsskrift, 29, 345
  18. Petersen H. E., 1910, An account of Danish freshwater phycomycetes, with biological and systematical remarks, Ann. Mycol., 8, 494
  19. Schaffner J. H., 1909, The classification of plants, IV, Ohio Nat., 9, 446
  20. 10.1080/15572536.2006.11832635 · DOI
  21. 10.1093/molbev/msp185 · DOI
  22. 10.1186/1471-2148-10-377 · DOI
  23. 10.1016/j.protis.2010.10.002 · DOI
  24. 10.1111/j.1550-7408.2008.00379.x · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 1,680

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Adl, S. M., Simpson, A. G. B., Lane, C. E., Lukeš, J., Bass, D., Bowser, S. S., Brown, M. W., Burki, F., Dunthorn, M., Hampl, V., Heiss, A., Hoppenrath, M., Lara, E., le Gall, L., Lynn, D. H., McManus, H., Mitchell, E. A. D., Mozley‐Stanridge, S. E., Parfrey, L. W., Pawlowski, J., Rueckert, S., Shadwick, L., Schoch, C. L., Smirnov, A., & Spiegel, F. W.
Affiliations
  • Dalhousie University (CA)
  • University of Rhode Island (US)
  • University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice (CZ)
  • Natural History Museum (GB)
  • New York State Department of Health (US)
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
  • University of Kaiserslautern (DE)
  • Department of Parasitology Charles University Prague 128 43 Praha 2 Czech Republic
  • Senckenberg am Meer (DE)
  • University of Neuchâtel (CH)
  • Muséum National d'Histoire Naturellem, UMR 7138 Systématique, Adaptation et Evolution Paris 75231 Cedex Paris 05 France
  • University of Guelph (CA)
  • Le Moyne College (US)
  • Department of Biology Middle Georgia College Cochran Georgia 31014 USA
  • University of Colorado Boulder (US)
  • University of Geneva (CH)
  • Edinburgh Napier University (GB)
  • Department of Biological Sciences University of Arkansas Fayetteville Arkansas 72701 USA
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • Department of Invertebrate Zoology St.Petersburg State University St. Petersburg 199034 Russia
  • University of Arkansas at Fayetteville (US)
ORCID
Venue
Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-09
Volume
59
Issue
5
Pages
429-514
ISSN
  • 1066-5234 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-7408
DOI
10.1111/j.1550-7408.2012.00644.x
PMC
PMC3483872
OpenAlex
W2073302338
Cited by
1,680
References
212
Citations by year
2026: 34 · 2025: 63 · 2024: 65 · 2023: 102 · 2022: 83 · 2021: 113 · 2020: 105 · 2019: 105 · 2018: 174 · 2017: 225 · 2016: 215 · 2015: 162 · 2014: 147 · 2013: 78 · 2012: 9
FWCI
51.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Update notices
erratum (2013-03-11)
Open access
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor, 27 d)
Locations
  • Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • reroDoc Digital Library (submittedVersion)
  • Journal of Media Literacy Education (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • ASEP (submittedVersion, public-domain)
  • Universitätsbibliographie, Universität Duisburg-Essen (submittedVersion)
  • Research Output (Edinburgh Napier University) (submittedVersion)
  • Edinburgh Napier Research Repository (Edinburgh Napier University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Natural Environment Research Council (NE/H009426/1, NE/H000887/1)
  • U.S. National Library of Medicine (ZIHLM200888)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Protist diversity and phylogeny
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Plant Diversity and Evolution
Keywords
protists, supergroups, phylogenetic tree, eukaryotic diversity, metagenomics
MeSH terms
Terminology as Topic, Phylogeny, Genome, Eukaryota

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review