Origins of Electro‐Mechanical Coupling in Polycrystalline Ferroelectrics During Subcoercive Electrical Loading

Abstract

The electromechanical coupling in ferroelectric materials is controlled by several coexisting structural phenomena which can include piezoelectric lattice strain, 180° and non‐180° domain wall motion, and interphase boundary motion. The structural mechanisms that contribute to electromechanical coupling have not been readily measured in the past, particularly under the low‐to‐medium driving electric field amplitudes at which many piezoelectric materials are used. In this feature, results from in situ , high‐energy, and time‐resolved X‐ray diffraction experiments are interpreted together with macroscopic piezoelectric coefficient measurements in order to better understand the contribution of these mechanisms to the electromechanical coupling of polycrystalline ferroelectric materials. The compositions investigated include 2 mol% La‐doped PbZr 0.60 Ti 0.40 O 3 , 2 mol% La‐doped PbZr 0.52 Ti 0.48 O 3 , 2 mol% La‐doped PbZr 0.40 Ti 0.60 O 3 , undoped PbZr 0.52 Ti 0.48 O 3 , and 2 mol% Fe‐doped PbZr 0.47 Ti 0.53 O 3 . In all compositions, a strong correlation is found between the field‐amplitude‐dependence of the macroscopic piezoelectric coefficient and the contribution of non‐180° domain wall motion determined from the diffraction data. The results show directly that the Rayleigh‐like behavior of d 33 piezoelectric coefficient is predominantly due to a Rayleigh‐like behavior of non‐180° domain wall motion. Furthermore, after separating contributions from lattice (atomic level) and domain wall motion (nanoscale level) to the measured macroscopic piezoelectric properties, we show that previously ignored intergranular interactions (microscopic level) account for a surprisingly large portion of the electromechanical coupling. These results demonstrate that electromechanical coupling in polycrystalline aggregates is substantially different from that observed in single crystalline materials. The construct of emergence is used to describe how averaged macrolevel phenomena are different from the material response observed in an isolated subcomponent of the material. Consequently, and due to its size‐scale complexity, the description of grain‐to‐grain interactions is presently inaccessible in most ab initio and phenomenological approaches. Results presented here demonstrate the need to account for these interactions in order to completely describe macroscopic electromechanical properties of polycrystalline materials.