Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 104

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 51 of the 51 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Semantics of Prosody: Acoustic and Perceptual Evidence of Prosodic Correlates to Word Meaning

Nygaard, Lynne C., Herold, Debora S., Namy, Laura L.·2009·Cognitive Science

Abstract

This investigation examined whether speakers produce reliable prosodic correlates to meaning across semantic domains and whether listeners use these cues to derive word meaning from novel words. Speakers were asked to produce phrases in infant‐directed speech in which novel words were used to convey one of two meanings from a set of antonym pairs (e.g., big/small). Acoustic analyses revealed that some acoustic features were correlated with overall valence of the meaning. However, each word meaning also displayed a unique acoustic signature, and semantically related meanings elicited similar acoustic profiles. In two perceptual tests, listeners either attempted to identify the novel words with a matching meaning dimension (picture pair) or with mismatched meaning dimensions. Listeners inferred the meaning of the novel words significantly more often when prosody matched the word meaning choices than when prosody mismatched. These findings suggest that speech contains reliable prosodic markers to word meaning and that listeners use these prosodic cues to differentiate meanings. That prosody is semantic suggests a reconceptualization of traditional distinctions between linguistic and nonlinguistic properties of spoken language.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2008.01007.x

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Berlin B., 1994, Sound symbolism, 76
  2. 10.1111/j.1467-8624.1990.tb03568.x · DOI
  3. Herold D. S., 2006, Acoustic correlates to meaning in infant‐directed speech
  4. Hinton L., 1994, Sound symbolism, 1
  5. Wales R., 1979, Sentence processing: Psycholingustic studies presented to Merrill Garrett, 135

Cited by

See all 104

Metadata

Authors
Nygaard, L. C., Herold, D. S., & Namy, L. L.
Venue
Cognitive Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-01
Volume
33
Issue
1
Pages
127-146
ISSN
  • 0364-0213
  • 1551-6709
Cited by
104
References
51
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.