Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,433

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Meaning of Intonational Contours in the Interpretation of Discourse

Pierrehumbert, Janet, Hirschberg, Julia·1990·Intentions in Communication

Abstract

Recent investigations of the contribution that intonation makes to overall utterance and discourse interpretation promise new sources of information for the investigation of long-time concerns in natural-language processing.In Hirschberg and Pierrehumbert 1986 we proposed that intonational features such as phrasing, accmt pUuttTWIt, pilch rangt, and huIe represent important sources of information about the attmh0ru3l and the rntmt10rIJAl structures of discourse.I In this paper we examine the particular contribution of choice of tune, or int0ru3h0ru3l cantour, to discourse interpretation.In particular, we propose that a speaker (5) chooses a particular tune to convey a particular relationship between an utterance, currently perceived beliefs of a hearer or hearers (H), and anticipated contributions of subsequent utterances.We claim that these relationships are compositionalcomposed from the pitch aumts, phrase QCcmts, and bowndary tones that make up tunes.We further propose that the different aspects of tune meaning can be associated with different phonological domains.We assume the intorIJAtional phrase as our primary unit of meaning analysis.In the following discussion we put forward a first approximation of a compositional theory of tune interpretation.together with the phonological assumptions on which it is based and the evidence from which we have drawn our proposals.We assume Pierrehumbert's Wierrehumbert 198{);Beckman and Pierrehurnbert 1986a) theory of intonational description.which we describe in sections 2-3.In section 4 we present our general approach to intonational meaning.In sections 5 -7 we present the data upon which we base this account.In section 8 we explore avenues of further development for the theory and discuss implications for the study of discourse.2 Dimmslcn5 of IntOf1lltianai Variation PrrlimiruzriesIn describing intonation patterns, we distinguish str~, twu, phrasing, and PItch rar1Kt.5t-r~ refers to the rhythmic pattern or relative prominence of

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7551/mitpress/3839.003.0016

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 1,433

Metadata

Authors
Pierrehumbert, J., & Hirschberg, J.
Venue
Intentions in Communication
Publisher
The MIT Press
Published
1990-06-28
Pages
271-312
OpenAlex
W2546732126
Cited by
1,433
References
0
FWCI
18.05
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Meaning of Intonational Contours in the Interpretation of Discourse. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.7551/mitpress/3839.003.0016
The paper
Pierrehumbert, J., & Hirschberg, J. (1990). The Meaning of Intonational Contours in the Interpretation of Discourse. Intentions in Communication. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/3839.003.0016

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.