The DOI matches its Crossref record; 49 of the 49 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Practice Standards for Transcranial Doppler (TCD) Ultrasound. Part II. Clinical Indications and Expected Outcomes
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Transcranial Doppler (TCD) is a physiological ultrasound test with established safety and efficacy. Although imaging devices may be used to depict intracranial flow superimposed on structural visualization, the end‐result provided by imaging duplex or nonimaging TCD is sampling physiological flow variables through the spectral waveform assessment. SUMMARY OF RESULTS: Clinical indications considered by this multidisciplinary panel of experts as established are: sickle cell disease, cerebral ischemia, detection of right‐to‐left shunts (RLS), subarachnoid hemorrhage, brain death, and periprocedural or surgical monitoring. The following TCD‐procedures are performed in routine in‐ and outpatient clinical practice: complete or partial TCD‐examination to detect normal, stenosed, or occluded intracranial vessels, collaterals to locate an arterial obstruction and refine carotid‐duplex or noninvasive angiographic findings; vasomotor reactivity testing to identify high‐risk patients for first‐ever or recurrent stroke; emboli detection to detect, localize, and quantify cerebral embolization in real time; RLS‐detection in patients with suspected paradoxical embolism or those considered for shunt closure; monitoring of thrombolysis to facilitate recanalization and detect reocclusion; monitoring of endovascular stenting, carotid endarterectomy, and cardiac surgery to detect perioperative embolism, thrombosis, hypo‐ and hyperperfusion. CONCLUSION: By defining the scope of practice, these standards will assist referring and reporting physicians and third parties involved in the process of requesting, evaluating, and acting upon TCD results.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Noninvasive transcranial Doppler ultrasound recording of flow velocity in basal cerebral arteries
Aaslid, R., Markwalder, T.-M., & Nornes, H. (1982) · Journal of Neurosurgery · doi:10.3171/jns.1982.57.6.0769 · Cited by 3,046
Adams, R. J., McKie, V. C., Hsu, L., Files, B., Vichinsky, E., Pegelow, C., Abboud, M., Gallagher, D., Kutlar, A., Nichols, F. T., et al. (1998) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199807023390102 · Cited by 1,866
Comparison of Warfarin and Aspirin for Symptomatic Intracranial Arterial Stenosis
Chimowitz, M. I., Lynn, M. J., Howlett-Smith, H., Stern, B. J., Hertzberg, V. S., Frankel, M. R., Levine, S. R., Chaturvedi, S., Kasner, S. E., Benesch, C. G., et al. (2005) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa043033 · Cited by 1,744
The Impact of Recanalization on Ischemic Stroke Outcome: A Meta-Analysis
Rha, J.-H., & Saver, J. L. (2007) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/01.str.0000258112.14918.24 · Cited by 1,452
Dams, R. O. J. A., Ie, V. I. C. M. C. K., Su, L. E. H., Iles, B. E. F., Ichinsky, E. L. V., Egelow, C. H. P., Bboud, M. I. A., Allagher, D. I. G., Utlar, K., Ichols, F. E. T. N., et al. (2015) · Cited by 1,338
Markus, H. S., Droste, D. W., Kaps, M., Larrue, V., Lees, K. R., Siebler, M., & Ringelstein, E. B. (2005) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.0000163561.90680.1c · Cited by 754
Self-citationSaqqur, M., Uchino, K., Demchuk, A. M., Molina, C. A., Garami, Z., Calleja, S., Akhtar, N., Orouk, F. O., Salam, A., Shuaib, A., et al. (2007) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/01.str.0000257304.21967.ba · Cited by 688
Self-citationThe Use of Transcranial Ultrasonography to Predict Stroke in Sickle Cell Disease
Adams, R., McKie, V., Nichols, F., Carl, E., Zhang, D.-L., McKie, K., Figueroa, R., Litaker, M., Thompson, W., & Hess, D. (1992) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199202273260905 · Cited by 658
Discontinuing Prophylactic Transfusions Used to Prevent Stroke in Sickle Cell Disease
(2005) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa050460 · Cited by 635
Silvestrini, M. (2000) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.283.16.2122 · Cited by 587
Cited by
Severe carotid stenosis and impaired cerebral hemodynamics can influence cognitive deterioration
Balestrini, S., Perozzi, C., Altamura, C., Vernieri, F., Luzzi, S., Bartolini, M., Provinciali, L., & Silvestrini, M. (2013) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.0b013e318295d71a · Cited by 126
Metadata
- Authors
- Alexandrov, A. V., Sloan, M. A., Tegeler, C. H., Newell, D. N., Lumsden, A., Garami, Z., Levy, C. R., Wong, L. K. S., Douville, C., Kaps, M., Tsivgoulis, G., & for the American Society of Neuroimaging Practice Guidelines Committee
- Venue
- Journal of Neuroimaging
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-10-26
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 215-224
- ISSN
- 1051-2284 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-6569
- OpenAlex
- W2084337046
- Cited by
- 272
- References
- 49
- FWCI
- 10.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Practice Standards for Transcranial Doppler (TCD) Ultrasound. Part II. Clinical Indications and Expected Outcomes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1552-6569.2010.00523.x
- The paper
- Alexandrov, A. V., Sloan, M. A., Tegeler, C. H., Newell, D. N., Lumsden, A., Garami, Z., Levy, C. R., Wong, L. K. S., Douville, C., Kaps, M., Tsivgoulis, G., & for the American Society of Neuroimaging Practice Guidelines Committee. (2012). Practice Standards for Transcranial Doppler (TCD) Ultrasound. Part II. Clinical Indications and Expected Outcomes. Journal of Neuroimaging. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1552-6569.2010.00523.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.