Cited by 54Maternal and Neonatal HealthcareInfant Development and Preterm CareGlobal Maternal and Child Health

The Impact of Prenatal Care Coordination on Birth Outcomes

Willems Van Dijk, Julie A., Anderko, Laura, Stetzer, Frank·2011·Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic & Neonatal Nursing

Abstract

Objective To measure the impact of a Medicaid benefit called Prenatal Care Coordination (PNCC) on healthy birth outcomes. Design A cross-sectional design was used to compare the birth outcomes of infants born to women who received Medicaid and PNCC services to the birth outcomes of infants born to women who received Medicaid but did not receive PNCC services. Setting Services were provided in community based settings in Wisconsin. Participants Of the 45,406 Medicaid births in 2001 to 2002, 10,715 (23.6%) mothers received PNCC services and were considered the treatment group. Methods Secondary analyses of birth certificate and Medicaid billing data were conducted using binary logistic regression analyses to evaluate the impact of PNCC and the hours of PNCC service on birth outcomes. Results Controlling for nine covariates, women who received PNCC services were found to have significantly better birth outcomes, including fewer low-birth-weight infants (odds ratio [OR]=0.84; 95% CI [.777, .912]), fewer very-low-birth-weight infants (OR=0.70; 95% CI [.587, .855]), fewer preterm infants (OR=0.83; 95% CI [.776, .890]), and fewer infants transferred to the neonatal intensive care units (OR=.83; 95% CI [.759, .906]). Women who received 6 or more hours of service were less likely to deliver infants with poor birth outcomes. Conclusions The use of PNCC is an effective strategy for preventing adverse birth outcomes. Strategies to further enhance PNCC's positive benefits include increase…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1552-6909.2010.01206.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Michigan-based Maternal and Infant Health Program, similar in design to the Nursing Family Partnership, is funded by Medicaid and is a home-visiting service available to all Medicaid-eligible pregnant women in the state.

    “Also, the Michigan-based Maternal and Infant Health Program, similar in design to the Nursing Family Partnership, is funded by Medicaid and is a home-visiting service available to all Medicaid-eligible pregnant women in the state.76”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Willems Van Dijk, J. A., Anderko, L., & Stetzer, F.
Affiliations
  • Georgetown University (US)
  • University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee (US)
Venue
Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic & Neonatal Nursing
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-01
Volume
40
Issue
1
Pages
98-108
ISSN
  • 0090-0311 (ISSN-L)
  • 0884-2175
OpenAlex
W1730789888
Cited by
54
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
FWCI
5.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic & Neonatal Nursing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Wisconsin Department of Health Services
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Infant Development and Preterm Care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Global Maternal and Child Health
Keywords
Medicaid, birth outcomes, low birth weight, very low birth weight, preterm birth, neonatal intensive care admission, Wisconsin
MeSH terms
Adult, Continuity of Patient Care, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Maternal Health Services, Medicaid, Organizational Objectives, Patient Education as Topic, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Outcome, Prenatal Care, United States, Wisconsin, Program Evaluation, Confidence Intervals, Odds Ratio, Interdisciplinary Communication, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review