Cited by 30Empathy and Medical EducationEmergency Medicine Education and ResearchInnovations in Medical Education

Teaching Patient Empathy The ED Visit Program

Seaberg, David C., Godwin, Steven A., Perry, Shawna J.·2000·Academic Emergency Medicine

Abstract

Abstract. Objective: Residency programs only are not challenged with developing competent emergency clinicians, but should strive to develop caring, empathetic, and community‐minded physicians. An exercise was designed to help residents experience emergency department (ED) visits from the patient's perspective. Methods: This study occurred in emergency medicine residency program at an urban teaching institution with an annual ED census of 94,000. On the first day of residency orientation, each resident was given a clinical scenario and registered through triage into the ED. Nurses were blinded to the study. The study concluded when the examining physician entered the exam room. Residents were then presented with a simulated bill based on their scenario. Residents completed a survey initially and at six months. Survey ratings were measured using a 100‐mm visual analog scale (VAS) (0 = not at all; 100 = a great deal). Results: Twenty‐five residents participated over two years. Sixty‐four percent had never been an ED patient before. Median length of stay was 139 minutes. This exercise was found to improve resident empathy for patients on initial survey, 66 mm (range 16‐71), and at follow‐up, 66 mm (range 23‐91). Residents found the exercise useful both initially, 50 mm (range 4‐86), and at follow‐up, 49 mm (range 15‐81). Ninety‐two percent of the residents thought the goals of the exercise had been met. Residents also stated the study changed their approach to patient care (45 mm, range 4‐76) and made them a better physician (49 mm, range 5‐80). Conclusions: The ED visit study enhanced patient empathy within residents and was useful in improving patient care attitude.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2000.tb00504.x

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There is some evidence that having providers take on the role of patients in role-play exercises can increase empathy among health care providers.

    “There is also some evidence that having providers take on the role of patients in role-play exercises can increase empathy among health care providers. This strategy might be useful in team discussions of difficult patients.95–97”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Seaberg, D. C., Godwin, S. A., & Perry, S. J.
Affiliations
University of Florida Health Science Center (US)
Corresponding author
Seaberg, David C.
Venue
Academic Emergency Medicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2000-12
Volume
7
Issue
12
Pages
1433-1436
ISSN
  • 1069-6563 (ISSN-L)
  • 1553-2712
OpenAlex
W2133890144
Cited by
30
References
9
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Academic Emergency Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Empathy and Medical Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Emergency Medicine Education and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
Keywords
patient empathy, emergency medicine residency, resident perspectives, patient experience, physician-patient relationship
MeSH terms
Adult, Education, Medical, Graduate, Emergency Medicine, Empathy, Humans, Internship and Residency, Physician-Patient Relations, Prospective Studies, Surveys and Questionnaires

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review