The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Traumatic Brain Injuries Evaluated in U.S. Emergency Departments, 1992‐1994
Abstract
Abstract. Objective: To describe the incidence and patient characteristics of traumatic brain injuries (TBIs) treated in U.S. emergency departments (EDs). Methods: A secondary analysis was performed on data from the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey administered from 1992 to 1994. An ED visit was determined to represent a case of TBI if the case record contained ICD‐9‐CM codes of 800.0‐801.9, 803.0‐804.9, or 850.0‐854.1. Results: The average annual estimate of new TBI treated in U.S. EDs was 1,144,807, equaling 444 per 100,000 persons (95% CI = 390 to 498), which represents approximately 3,136 new cases of TBI per day and accounts for 1.3% of all ED visits. Males were 1.6 times as likely as females to suffer TBI until the age of 65 years, when the female rate exceeded the male. The rate for blacks was 35% higher than that for whites. The highest overall incidence rate of TBI occurred in the less‐than‐5‐year age group (1,091 per 100,000), closely followed by the more‐than‐85‐year age group (1,026 per 100,000). Falls represented the most common mechanism of TBI injury, followed by motor vehicle‐related trauma. Conclusions: This study underscores the ongoing need for effective surveillance of all types of TBI and evaluation of prevention strategies targeting high‐risk individuals. It serves as a clinically grounded and ED‐based corroboration of prior survey research, providing a basis for comparison of incidence rates over time and a tool with which to measure the efficacy of future interventions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Incidence of mild and moderate brain injury in the United States, 1991
D. M. SOSIN, J. E. S. (1996) · Brain Injury · doi:10.1080/026990596124719 · Cited by 594
Cited by
The clinician's guide to prevention and treatment of osteoporosis
LeBoff, M. S., Greenspan, S. L., Insogna, K. L., Lewiecki, E. M., Saag, K. G., Singer, A. J., & Siris, E. S. (2022) · Osteoporosis International · doi:10.1007/s00198-021-05900-y · Cited by 1,487
The epidemiology of traumatic brain injury: a review
Bruns, J., & Hauser, W. A. (2003) · Epilepsia · doi:10.1046/j.1528-1157.44.s10.3.x · Cited by 1,271
The international incidence of traumatic brain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Nguyen, R., Fiest, K. M., McChesney, J., Kwon, C.-S., Jette, N., Frolkis, A. D., Atta, C., Mah, S., Dhaliwal, H., Reid, A., et al. (2016) · Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques · doi:10.1017/cjn.2016.290 · Cited by 484
Epidemiology and prevention of head injuries: literature review
Abelson‐Mitchell, N. (2008) · Journal of Clinical Nursing · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2702.2007.01941.x · Cited by 73
Effects of Stretching on Injury Risk Reduction and Balance
Behm, D. G., Kay, A. D., Trajano, G. S., Alizadeh, S., & Blazevich, A. J. (2021) · Journal of Clinical Exercise Physiology · doi:10.31189/2165-6193-10.3.106 · Cited by 59
Metadata
- Authors
- Jager, T. E., Weiss, H. B., Coben, J. H., & Pepe, P. E.
- Venue
- Academic Emergency Medicine
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2000-02
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 134-140
- ISSN
- 1069-6563 (ISSN-L)
- 1553-2712
- OpenAlex
- W2050564816
- Cited by
- 320
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.