Cited by 70Cardiac Arrest and ResuscitationHealthcare Technology and Patient MonitoringCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias

Continuous Electrocardiographic Monitoring and Cardiac Arrest Outcomes in 8,932 Telemetry Ward Patients

Open access
Schull, Michael J., Redelmeier, Donald A.·2000·Academic Emergency Medicine

Abstract

Abstract. Objective: To estimate the benefit of routine electrocardiographic (ECG) telemetry monitoring on in‐hospital cardiac arrest survival. Methods: In a tertiary care hospital, all telemetry ward admissions and cardiac arrests occurring over a five‐year period were reviewed. Ward location and survival to discharge were determined for all patients outside of critical care areas. Results: During the study period, 8,932 patients were admitted to the telemetry ward, and 20 suffered cardiac arrest (0.2%; 95% CI = 0.1 to 0.3). Telemetry monitors signaled the onset of cardiac arrest in only 56% (95% CI = 30 to 80) of monitored arrests. Three patients survived to discharge, and in two of these three patients the arrest onset was signaled by the monitor. This yields a monitor‐signaled survival rate among telemetry ward patients of 0.02% (95% CI = 0 to 0.05). All survivors suffered significant arrhythmias prior to their cardiac arrests. Conclusions: Cardiac arrest is an uncommon event among telemetry ward patients, and monitor‐signaled survivors are extremely rare. Routine telemetry offers little cardiac arrest survival benefit to most monitored patients, and a more selective policy for telemetry use might safely avoid ECG monitoring for many patients.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2000.tb02038.x

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [21]21. Kollek D. Overwhelmed in emergency: examining ER status at Hamilton Civil Hospitals. Ont Med Rev. 1990; 57:11- 3.
  2. [29]29. Hollander JE, Valentine SM, McCuskey CF, et al. Are mon- itored telemetry beds necessary for patients with non-trau- matic chest pain and normal or non-specific electrocardio- grams? Am J Cardiol. 1997; 79:1110-1.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schull, M. J., & Redelmeier, D. A.
Affiliations
Sunnybrook Health Science Centre (CA)
Corresponding author
Schull, Michael J.
Venue
Academic Emergency Medicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2000-06
Volume
7
Issue
6
Pages
647-652
ISSN
  • 1069-6563 (ISSN-L)
  • 1553-2712
OpenAlex
W2025564415
Cited by
70
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Academic Emergency Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Healthcare Technology and Patient Monitoring
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
Keywords
cardiac arrest, continuous ECG monitoring, cardiac arrhythmias
MeSH terms
Aged, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Heart Arrest, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Monitoring, Physiologic, Ontario, Sensitivity and Specificity, Telemetry, Electrocardiography, Ambulatory, Survival Rate, Confidence Intervals

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review