The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
End-tidal Carbon Dioxide Monitoring during Procedural Sedation
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To prospectively determine whether end-tidal carbon dioxide (ETCO2) monitors can detect respiratory depression (RD) and the level of sedation in emergency department (ED) patients undergoing procedural sedation (PS). METHODS: This was a prospective observational study conducted in an urban county hospital of adult patients undergoing PS. Patients were monitored for vital signs, depth of sedation per the physician by the Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation scale (OAA/S), pulse oximetry, and nasal-sample ETCO2 during PS. Respiratory depression was defined as an oxygen saturation <90%, an ETCO2 >50 mm Hg, or an absent ETCO2 waveform at any time during the procedure. The physician also determined whether protective airway reflexes were lost during the procedure and assisted ventilation was required, or whether there were any other complications. Rates of RD were compared with the physician assessment of airway loss and between agents using chi-square statistics. Spearman's rho analysis was used to determine whether there was a correlation between ETCO2 and the OAA/S score. RESULTS: Seventy-four patients were enrolled in the study. Forty (54.1%) received methohexital, 21 (28.4%) received propofol, ten (13.5%) received fentanyl and midazolam, and three (4.1%) received etomidate. Respiratory depression was seen in 33 (44.6%) patients, including 47.5% of patients receiving methohexital, 19% receiving propofol (p = 0.008), 80% receiving fentanyl and midazolam, and 66.6% receiving etomidate. No correlation between OAA/S and ETCO2 was detected. Eleven (14.9%) patients required assisted ventilation at some point during the procedure, all of whom met the criteria for RD. Pulse oximetry detected 11 of the 33 patients with RD. Post-hoc analysis revealed that all patients with RD had an ETCO2 >50 mm Hg, an absent waveform, or an absolute change from baseline in ETCO2 >10 mm Hg. CONCLUSIONS: There was no correlation between ETCO2 and the OAA/S score. Using the criteria of an ETCO2 >50 mm Hg, an absolute change >10 mm Hg, or an absent waveform may detect subclinical RD not detected by pulse oximetry alone. The ETCO2 may add to the safety of PS by quickly detecting hypoventilation during PS in the ED.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Validity and Reliability of the Observer??s: Assessment of Alertness/Sedation Scale
CHERNIK, D. A., GILLINGS, D., LAINE, H., HENDLER, J., SILVER, J. M., DAVIDSON, A. B., SCHWAM, E. M., & SIEGEL, J. L. (1990) · Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1097/00004714-199008000-00003 · Cited by 1,246
Clinical Policy: Procedural Sedation and Analgesia in the Emergency Department
Godwin, S. A., Burton, J. H., Gerardo, C. J., Hatten, B. W., Mace, S. E., Silvers, S. M., & Fesmire, F. M. (2014) · Annals of Emergency Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2013.10.015 · Cited by 642
Adverse events of procedural sedation and analgesia in a pediatric emergency department
Peña, B. M. G., & Krauss, B. (1999) · Annals of Emergency Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0196-0644(99)80050-x · Cited by 326
Clinical Policy for Procedural Sedation and Analgesia in the Emergency Department
Jagoda, A. S., Campbell, M., Karas, S., Mariani, P. J., Shepherd, S. M., Cantrill, S. V., Campbell, M., Colucciello, S. A., Dalsey, W. C., Fesmire, F. M., et al. (1998) · Annals of Emergency Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0196-0644(98)70216-1 · Cited by 165
Hart, L. S., Berns, S. D., Houck, C. S., et al. (1997) · Pediatric Emergency Care · doi:10.1097/00006565-199706000-00004 · Cited by 148
Tobias, J. D. (1999) · Pediatric Emergency Care · doi:10.1097/00006565-199906000-00002 · Cited by 113
Poirier, M. P., Del-Rey, J. A. G., McAneney, C. M., & DiGiulio, G. A. (1998) · The American Journal of Emergency Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0735-6757(98)90125-5 · Cited by 107
Grosenbaugh, D. A., & Muir, W. W. (1998) · American Journal of Veterinary Research · doi:10.2460/ajvr.1998.59.02.205 · Cited by 69
Propofol for Emergency Department Procedural Sedation—Not Yet Ready for Prime Time
Green, S. M. (1999) · Academic Emergency Medicine · doi:10.1111/j.1553-2712.1999.tb01176.x · Cited by 52
Cited by
American Academy of Pediatrics, American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry, Coté, C. J., Wilson, S., & the Work Group on Sedation (2006) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.2006-2780 · Cited by 555
Update on Bispectral Index monitoring
Johansen, J. W. (2006) · Best Practice & Research Clinical Anaesthesiology · doi:10.1016/j.bpa.2005.08.004 · Cited by 313
Clinical policy: Procedural sedation and analgesia in the emergency department
Godwin, S. A., Caro, D. A., Wolf, S. J., Jagoda, A. S., Charles, R., Marett, B. E., & Moore, J. (2005) · Annals of Emergency Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2004.11.002 · Cited by 281
Development of a screening protocol to identify individuals with dysfunctional breathing
Kiesel, K., Rhodes, T., Mueller, J., Waninger, A., & Butler, R. (2017) · International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy · doi:10.26603/ijspt20170774 · Cited by 42
Breathing evaluation and retraining in manual therapy
McLaughlin, L. (2009) · Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies · doi:10.1016/j.jbmt.2009.01.005 · Cited by 29
Metadata
- Authors
- Miner, J. R., Heegaard, W., & Plummer, D.
- Venue
- Academic Emergency Medicine
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-04
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 275-280
- ISSN
- 1069-6563 (ISSN-L)
- 1553-2712
- OpenAlex
- W2128643063
- Cited by
- 285
- References
- 14
- FWCI
- 17.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: End-tidal Carbon Dioxide Monitoring during Procedural Sedation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1553-2712.2002.tb01318.x
- The paper
- Miner, J. R., Heegaard, W., & Plummer, D. (2002). End-tidal Carbon Dioxide Monitoring during Procedural Sedation. Academic Emergency Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1553-2712.2002.tb01318.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.