The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sensitivity of Bedside Ultrasound and Supine Anteroposterior Chest Radiographs for the Identification of Pneumothorax After Blunt Trauma
Open accessAbstract
Objectives: Supine anteroposterior (AP) chest radiographs in patients with blunt trauma have poor sensitivity for the identification of pneumothorax. Ultrasound (US) has been proposed as an alternative screening test for pneumothorax in this population. The authors conducted an evidence‐based review of the medical literature to compare sensitivity of bedside US and AP chest radiographs in identifying pneumothorax after blunt trauma. Methods: MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were searched for trials from 1965 through June 2009 using a search strategy derived from the following PICO formulation of our clinical question: patients included adult (18 + years) emergency department (ED) patients in whom pneumothorax was suspected after blunt trauma. The intervention was thoracic ultrasonography for the detection of pneumothorax. The comparator was the supine AP chest radiograph during the initial evaluation of the patient. The outcome was the diagnostic performance of US in identifying the presence of pneumothorax in the study population. The criterion standard for the presence or absence of pneumothorax was computed tomography (CT) of the chest or a rush of air during thoracostomy tube placement (in unstable patients). Prospective, observational trials of emergency physician (EP)‐performed thoracic US were included. Trials in which the exams were performed by radiologists or surgeons, or trials that investigated patients suffering penetrating trauma or with spontaneous or iatrogenic pneumothoraces, were excluded. The methodologic quality of the studies was assessed. Qualitative methods were used to summarize the study results. Data analysis consisted of test performance (sensitivity and specificity, with 95% confidence intervals [CIs]) of thoracic US and supine AP chest radiography. Results: Four prospective observational studies were identified, with a total of 606 subjects who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The sensitivity and specificity of US for the detection of pneumothorax ranged from 86% to 98% and 97% to 100%, respectively. The sensitivity of supine AP chest radiographs for the detection of pneumothorax ranged from 28% to 75%. The specificity of supine AP chest radiographs was 100% in all included studies. Conclusions: This evidence‐based review suggests that bedside thoracic US is a more sensitive screening test than supine AP chest radiography for the detection of pneumothorax in adult patients with blunt chest trauma. ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE 2010; 17:11–17 © 2010 by the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Whiting, P., Rutjes, A. W., Reitsma, J. B., Bossuyt, P. M., & Kleijnen, J. (2003) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/1471-2288-3-25 · Cited by 3,592
The STARD Statement for Reporting Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: Explanation and Elaboration
Bossuyt, P. M., Reitsma, J. B., Bruns, D. E., Gatsonis, C. A., Glasziou, P. P., Irwig, L. M., Moher, D., Rennie, D., de Vet, H. C. W., & Lijmer, J. G. (2003) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-138-1-200301070-00012-w1 · Cited by 1,124
Evaluation of QUADAS, a tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies
Whiting, P. F., Weswood, M. E., Rutjes, A. W., Reitsma, J. B., Bossuyt, P. N., & Kleijnen, J. (2006) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/1471-2288-6-9 · Cited by 769
Ultrasound diagnosis of occult pneumothorax*
Lichtenstein, D. A., Mezière, G., Lascols, N., Biderman, P., Courret, J.-P., Gepner, A., Goldstein, I., & Tenoudji-Cohen, M. (2005) · Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1097/01.ccm.0000164542.86954.b4 · Cited by 632
Emergency Ultrasound Guidelines
(2009) · Annals of Emergency Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2008.12.013 · Cited by 571
No role for quality scores in systematic reviews of diagnostic accuracy studies
Whiting, P., Harbord, R., & Kleijnen, J. (2005) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/1471-2288-5-19 · Cited by 337
Emergency Ultrasound Guidelines
October, A. (2008) · Cited by 304
Rapid detection of pneumothorax by ultrasonography in patients with multiple trauma
Zhang, M., Liu, Z.-H., Yang, J.-X., Gan, J.-X., Xu, S.-W., You, X.-D., & Jiang, G.-Y. (2006) · Critical Care · doi:10.1186/cc5004 · Cited by 274
Wernecke, K., Galanski, M., Peters, P. E., et al. (1987) · Journal of Thoracic Imaging · doi:10.1097/00005382-198704000-00015 · Cited by 144
Rantanen, N. W. (1986) · Veterinary Clinics of North America Equine Practice · doi:10.1016/s0749-0739(17)30732-0 · Cited by 130
Metadata
- Authors
- Gentry Wilkerson, R., & Stone, M. B.
- Venue
- Academic Emergency Medicine
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-01
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 11-17
- ISSN
- 1069-6563 (ISSN-L)
- 1553-2712
- OpenAlex
- W1997851348
- Cited by
- 301
- References
- 10
- FWCI
- 13.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sensitivity of Bedside Ultrasound and Supine Anteroposterior Chest Radiographs for the Identification of Pneumothorax After Blunt Trauma. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1553-2712.2009.00628.x
- The paper
- Gentry Wilkerson, R., & Stone, M. B. (2010). Sensitivity of Bedside Ultrasound and Supine Anteroposterior Chest Radiographs for the Identification of Pneumothorax After Blunt Trauma. Academic Emergency Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1553-2712.2009.00628.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.