Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 632

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Ultrasound diagnosis of occult pneumothorax*

Lichtenstein, Daniel A., Mezière, Gilbert, Lascols, Nathalie, Biderman, Philippe, Courret, Jean-Paul, Gepner, Agnès, Goldstein, Ivan, Tenoudji-Cohen, Marc·2005·Critical Care Medicine

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Pneumothorax can be missed by bedside radiography, and computed tomography is the current alternative. We asked whether lung ultrasound could be of any help in this situation. DESIGN: Retrospective study. SETTING: The medical intensive care unit of a university-affiliated teaching hospital. PATIENTS: All patients admitted to the intensive care unit are routinely scanned with whole-body ultrasound (including screening for pneumothorax) and chest radiography. The study population included 200 consecutive undifferentiated intensive care unit patients who received a chest computed tomography scan in addition to ultrasound and chest radiograph. Forty-seven consecutive cases of radioccult pneumothorax were compared with 310 consecutive hemithoraces free from pneumothorax in the intensive care unit. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Three signs were investigated at the anterolateral chest wall in supine patients: lung sliding, the A line sign, and the lung point. A total of 357 hemithoraces were analyzed in this study, 47 with occult pneumothorax and 310 controls. Four of the 47 cases of pneumothorax were excluded from the final analysis (parietal emphysema) as well as eight of the 310 controls (large dressings), leaving a final study population of 345 hemithoraces in 197 patients. Feasibility was 98%. Ultrasound scans in all 43 examinable patients with pneumothorax showed absent lung sliding, 41 of 43 patients had the A line sign, and 34 exhibited a lung point. Among 302 analyzable controls, 65 had absent lung sliding, 16 of them showed an A line sign, and none showed a lung point. For the diagnosis of occult pneumothorax, the abolition of lung sliding alone had a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 78%. Absent lung sliding plus the A line sign had a sensitivity of 95% and a specificity of 94%. The lung point had a sensitivity of 79% and a specificity of 100%. CONCLUSIONS: For the diagnosis of occult pneumothorax, ultrasound can decrease the need for computed tomography.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/01.ccm.0000164542.86954.b4

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 15 references

Metadata

Authors
Lichtenstein, D. A., Mezière, G., Lascols, N., Biderman, P., Courret, J.-P., Gepner, A., Goldstein, I., & Tenoudji-Cohen, M.
Venue
Critical Care Medicine
Published
2005-06
Volume
33
Issue
6
Pages
1231-1238
ISSN
0090-3493 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2161590196
Cited by
632
References
15
FWCI
12.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ultrasound diagnosis of occult pneumothorax*. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.ccm.0000164542.86954.b4
The paper
Lichtenstein, D. A., Mezière, G., Lascols, N., Biderman, P., Courret, J.-P., Gepner, A., Goldstein, I., & Tenoudji-Cohen, M. (2005). Ultrasound diagnosis of occult pneumothorax*. Critical Care Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ccm.0000164542.86954.b4

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.