Cited by 67

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Failure of anthropometry as a facial identification technique using high-quality photographs

Kleinberg, Krista F., Vanezis, Peter, Burton, A. Mike·2007·Journal of Forensic Sciences

Abstract

Abstract: Anthropometry can be used in certain circumstances to facilitate comparison of a photograph of a suspect with that of the potential offender from surveillance footage. Experimental research was conducted to determine whether anthropometry has a place in forensic practice in confirming the identity of a suspect from a surveillance video. We examined an existing database of photographic lineups, where one video image was compared against 10 photographs, which has previously been used in psychological research. Target (1) and test (10) photos were of high quality, although taken with a different camera. The anthropometric landmarks of right and left ectocanthions, nasion, and stomion were chosen, and proportions and angle values between these landmarks were measured to compare target with test photos. Results indicate that these measurements failed to accurately identify targets. There was also no indication that any of the landmarks made a better comparison than another. It was concluded that, for these landmarks, this method does not generate the consistent results necessary for use as evidence in a court of law.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2007.00458.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There is a concerning lack of standardization of required CCTV installation, recording conditions, and image quality.

    “While this global increase in CCTV data is beneficial to criminal investigation and facial comparison, there is a concerning lack of standardization of required installation, recording conditions, and image quality [20,82,89,90,91,92].”
  • Most systems are notably still lacking in applicability for facial comparison and are primarily disadvantaged not by installation and recording conditions but by image quality.

    “Most systems are notably still lacking in applicability for facial comparison and are primarily disadvantaged not by installation and recording conditions but by image quality [20,82,89,90,92].”

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 21

  1. Moenssens AA, 1971, Fingerprint techniques, 16
  2. Cole S, 2002, Suspect identities: a history of fingerprinting and criminal identification
  3. Taylor D, 1993, An anthropometric study of pedophiles and rapists, J Forensic Sci, 38, 765, 10.1520/JFS13471J · DOI
  4. 10.1520/JFS15168J · DOI
  5. 10.1016/0300-5712(95)00081-X · DOI
  6. 10.1597/1545-1569(1996)033<0010:AOAMPP>2.3.CO;2 · DOI
  7. Işcan M, 1993, Forensic analysis of the skull, in Introduction of techniques for photographic comparison: potential and problems, 57
  8. 10.1016/S0379-0738(00)00290-5 · DOI
  9. 10.1016/0379-0738(92)90142-J · DOI
  10. 10.1016/j.forsciint.2004.09.065 · DOI
  11. Lewis DL, 2004, Surveillance video in law enforcement, J Forensic Ident, 54, 547
  12. Aldridge J, 1994, Effective CCTV security and safety systems, CCTV Today, 12
  13. 10.1037/1076-898X.5.4.339 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Farkas LG, 1994, Anthropometry of the head and face
  15. Wells GL, 1998, Eyewitness identification procedures: recommendations for lineups and photospreads, Law Hum Behav, 22, 1, 10.1023/A:1025750605807 · DOI
  16. 10.1111/1467-9280.00144 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1348/000712600161907 · DOI
  18. 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0720(199706)11:3<211::AID-ACP430>3.0.CO;2-O · DOI
  19. 10.1520/JFS13998J · DOI
  20. 10.1016/S0379-0738(00)00149-3 · DOI
  21. Purkait R, 2004, The measurement techniques: how reliable are they? Anthropometric landmarks, Medico-Legal Update, 4, 133

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Kleinberg, K. F., Vanezis, P., & Burton, A. M.
Venue
Journal of Forensic Sciences
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-05-25
Volume
52
Issue
4
Pages
779-783
ISSN
  • 0022-1198
  • 1556-4029
Cited by
67
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review