Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 4,495

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

BUTTERFLIES AND PLANTS: A STUDY IN COEVOLUTION

Ehrlich, Paul R., Raven, Peter H.·1964·Evolution
DOI 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1964.tb01674.x
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Paul R. Ehrlich, Peter H. Raven; BUTTERFLIES AND PLANTS: A STUDY IN COEVOLUTION1, Evolution, Volume 18, Issue 4, 1 December 1964, Pages 586–608, https://do

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1964.tb01674.x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 60

  1. Alston R. E., 1963, Biochemical systematics
  2. Barrett C., 1951, Butterflies of Australia and New Guinea
  3. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1927.tb06703.x · DOI
  4. Bourgogne J., 1951, Ordre des Lépidoptères, Traité Zool., 10, 174
  5. 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1958.tb02926.x · DOI
  6. 10.1086/282025 · DOI
  7. Brower L. P., 1958, Larval food plant specificity in butterflies of the Papilio glaucus group, Lepidop. News, 12, 103
  8. 10.2307/2421852 · DOI
  9. Clench H. K., 1955, Revised classification of the butterfly family Lycaenidae and its allies, Ann. Carnegie Mus., 33, 261, 10.5962/p.226675 · DOI
  10. Corbet A. S., 1956, The butterflies of the Malay Peninsula
  11. 10.1086/280929 · DOI
  12. 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1954.tb00107.x · DOI
  13. 10.4039/Ent91581-9 · DOI
  14. Docters van Leeuwen W. M., 1958, Manual of pteridology, 192
  15. 10.2307/2411462 · DOI
  16. Downey J. C., 1961, Variation in Plebejus icarioides (Lycaenidae). I. Food plant specificity, J. Lepidop. Soc., 15, 34
  17. Ehrlich P. R., 1958, The comparative morphology, phylogeny and higher classification of the butterflies (Lepidoptera: Papilionoidea), Univ. Kansas Sci. Bull., 39, 305
  18. Ehrlich P. R., 1961, How to know the butterflies
  19. 10.1016/B978-0-12-395540-1.50008-7 · DOI
  20. 10.1016/B978-0-12-395540-1.50011-7 · DOI
  21. Forbes W. T. M., 1958, Caterpillars as botanists, Proc. Tenth Int. Congr. Ent., 1, 313
  22. Fraenkel G.1956.Insects and plant biochemistry.The specificity of food plants for insects. Proc. 14th Int. Congr. Zool. p.383–387.
  23. 10.1126/science.129.3361.1466 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1016/B978-0-12-395540-1.50007-5 · DOI
  25. 10.1146/annurev.en.06.010161.000331 · DOI
  26. Grant V., 1963, The origin of adaptations
  27. 10.1016/B978-0-12-395540-1.50017-8 · DOI
  28. 10.1016/B978-0-12-395540-1.50018-X · DOI
  29. 10.1086/282070 · DOI
  30. Hutchinson J., 1959, The families of flowering plants
  31. Jörgensen P., 1932, Lepidopterologisches aus Südamerika, Deutsch. Ent. Zeitschr. Iris, Dresden, 46, 37
  32. Klots A. B., 1933, A generic revision of the Pieridae (Lepidoptera), Entom. Amer. n.s., 12, 139
  33. Lee C. L., 1958, Butterflies
  34. 10.1146/annurev.en.01.010156.000313 · DOI
  35. Merz E., 1959, Pflanzen und Raupen, Über einige Prinzipien der Futterwahl bei Grossschmetterlingsraupen. Biol. Zentr., 78, 152
  36. Michener C. D., 1942, A generic revision of the Heliconiinae (Lepidoptera, Nymphalidae), Am. Mus. Novitates, 1197, 1
  37. 10.4039/entm9217fv · DOI
  38. Munroe E., 1960, Harmonization of concepts of higher classification of the Papilionidae, J. Lepid. Soc., 14, 169
  39. 10.1016/B978-0-12-395540-1.50016-6 · DOI
  40. Pinhey E. C. G., 1949, Butterflies of Rhodesia
  41. 10.1016/B978-0-12-395540-1.50019-1 · DOI
  42. Remington C. L., 1952, The biology of nearctic Lepidoptera I, Food plants and life‐histories of Colorado Papilionoidea. Psyche, 59, 61
  43. Reuter E., 1896, Über die Palpen der Rhopaloceren, Acta Soc. Sci. Fennica, 22, i
  44. Rodríguez R. L., 1957, Systematic anatomical studies on Myrrhidendron and other woody Umbellales, Univ. Calif. Publ. Bot., 29, 145
  45. 10.2307/2394742 · DOI
  46. 10.1126/science.120.3120.583 · DOI
  47. Seitz A., 1906, 1, 5, 9, 13
  48. Sheppard P. M., 1963, Some genetic studies of Müllerian mimics in butterflies of the genus Heliconius, Zoologica, 48, 145
  49. Shirôzu T., 1962, Evolution of the food‐habits of larvae of the thecline butterflies, Tyô to Ga (Trans. Lepidop. Soc. Japan), 12, 144
  50. Shirôzu T., 1956, A generic revision and the phylogeny of the tribe Theclini (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae), Sieboldia, 1, 329
  51. 10.1016/B978-0-12-395540-1.50014-2 · DOI
  52. 10.1016/B978-0-12-395540-1.50013-0 · DOI
  53. 10.1111/j.1096-3642.1919.tb01425.x · DOI
  54. 10.1086/282281 · DOI
  55. 10.1139/z53-006 · DOI
  56. 10.1146/annurev.en.05.010160.001205 · DOI
  57. Leonila Vazquez G., 1961, Observaciones sobre la biología de Baronia brevicornis Salv. (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae‐Baroniinae), An. Inst. Biol. Mex., 22, 295
  58. Verschaeffelt E., 1910, The cause determining the selection of food in some herbivorous insects, Proc. Acad. Sci., Amsterdam, 13, 536
  59. Wiltshire E. P., 1957, The Lepidoptera of Iraq
  60. Wynter‐Blyth M. A., 1957, Butterflies of the Indian region

Cited by

See all 4,495

Metadata

Authors
Ehrlich, P. R., & Raven, P. H.
Venue
Evolution
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Published
1964-12
Volume
18
Issue
4
Pages
586-608
ISSN
  • 0014-3820 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-5646
DOI
10.1111/j.1558-5646.1964.tb01674.x
OpenAlex
W2022751627
Cited by
4,495
References
0
FWCI
17.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Funders
National Science Foundation (GB‐123, GB‐141)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: BUTTERFLIES AND PLANTS: A STUDY IN COEVOLUTION. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1964.tb01674.x
The paper
Ehrlich, P. R., & Raven, P. H. (1964). BUTTERFLIES AND PLANTS: A STUDY IN COEVOLUTION. Evolution. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1964.tb01674.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.