Strategies in Herbivory by Mammals: The Role of Plant Secondary Compounds
Abstract
Large herbivores must select food from a wide variety of plant parts, species, and strains. These differ in nutritional value (protein, carbohydrate, etc.), toughness, spinosity, etc. Even greater differences are found in types and concentrations of secondary compounds. Every plant produces its own set of secondary chemical compounds, which to a great extent are unique to it or its species. Ingestion of natural concentrations of these compounds can lead to either death or severe physiological impairment. The ubiquitous nature of these compounds would make herbivory impossible unless animals had mechanisms for degrading and excreting them. An animal displaying no obvious symptoms of poisoning is not free of the problem of ridding itself of toxic compounds; if it is eating plants, it almost certainly has this problem. Herbivores are capable of detoxifying and eliminating secondary compounds. Limitations of these mechanisms force mammalian herbivores to consume a variety of plant foods at any one time, to treat new foods with caution, to ingest small amounts on the first encounter, and to sample food continuously. Selection of foods is based on learning in response to adverse internal physiological effects, and herbivores probably cannot predict these from the smell or taste of new foods. Herbivores prefer to eat familiar foods and can seek out and consume foods that rectify specific nutritional deficiencies induced by detoxification. They should prefer to feed on foods that con…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A generalist foraging strategy allows pygmy hippos to avoid over-ingestion of plant toxins.
“a foraging strategy that allows them to avoid over-ingestion of plant toxins (Freeland and Janzen, 1974).”
From A new method to determine the diet of pygmy hippopotamus in Taï National Park, Côte d’Ivoire (2021) · cites this paper as Freeland and Janzen, 1974
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Phytophagous insects as regulators of forest primary production
Mattson, W. J., & Addy, N. D. (1975) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.190.4214.515 · Cited by 573 · see citing works
The Metabolic and Ecological Interactions of Oxalate-Degrading Bacteria in the Mammalian Gut
Miller, A., & Dearing, D. (2013) · Pathogens · doi:10.3390/pathogens2040636 · Cited by 101 · see citing works
Field Metabolic Rate, Water Flux, and Food Consumption in Three-Toed Sloths (Bradypus variegatus)
Nagy, K. A., & Montgomery, G. G. (1980) · Journal of Mammalogy · doi:10.2307/1379840 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
African elephants use plant odours to make foraging decisions across multiple spatial scales
Schmitt, M. H., Shuttleworth, A., Ward, D., & Shrader, A. M. (2018) · Animal Behaviour · doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2018.04.016 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Multiple dimensions of dietary diversity in large mammalian herbivores
Kartzinel, T. R., & Pringle, R. M. (2020) · Journal of Animal Ecology · doi:10.1111/1365-2656.13206 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
A new method to determine the diet of pygmy hippopotamus in Taï National Park, Côte d’Ivoire
Hendier, A., Chatelain, C., Du Pasquier, P., Paris, M., Ouattara, K., Koné, I., Croll, D., & Zuberbühler, K. (2021) · African Journal of Ecology · doi:10.1111/aje.12888 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
- Authors
- Freeland, W. J., & Janzen, D. H.
- ORCID
- Janzen, Daniel H.
- Venue
- The American Naturalist
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 1974-05
- Volume
- 108
- Issue
- 961
- Pages
- 269-289
- ISSN
- 0003-0147 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5323
- OpenAlex
- W2045653366
- Cited by
- 1,358
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 14 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 39 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 42 · 2017: 35 · 2016: 39 · 2015: 42 · 2014: 45 · 2013: 41 · 2012: 32
- FWCI
- 46.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The American Naturalist (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Plant and animal studies
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Insect-Plant Interactions and Control
- Keywords
- mammalian herbivory, plant secondary metabolites, food choice, detoxification, plant chemical defense, feeding behavior, nutritional deficiency, specialist herbivores, Phascolarctos cinereus
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review