Cited by 159Animal Behavior and ReproductionEvolutionary Psychology and Human BehaviorReproductive biology and impacts on aquatic species

MALE RARITY OR NOVELTY, FEMALE CHOICE BEHAVIOR, AND SEXUAL SELECTION IN THE GUPPY,POECILIA RETICULATA PETERS (PISCES: POECILIIDAE)

Farr, James A.·1977·Evolution

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1977.tb00993.x

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Farr, J. A.
Affiliations
Florida State University (US)
Corresponding author
Farr, James A.
Venue
Evolution
Published
1977-03
Volume
31
Issue
1
Pages
162-168
ISSN
0014-3820 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2334473564
Cited by
159
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 1
FWCI
6.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Evolution (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Presbyterian Historical Society (MH 11218, NS 07468)
  • Florida State University
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Physiology › Reproductive biology and impacts on aquatic species
Keywords
sexual selection, female mate choice, Poecilia reticulata, color polymorphism, mate choice, Poeciliidae

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review