The DOI matches its Crossref record.
COUMARINS AND CATERPILLARS: A CASE FOR COEVOLUTION
Abstract
Ehrlich and Raven (1964) were among the first to focus on coevolution as a distinct evolutionary process. In their formulation, insect-plant coevolution is a five-step sequence: 1. by mutation and recombination, angiosperms produce novel secondary substances; 2. by chance, these new secondary substances alter the suitability of the plant as food for insects; 3. the plants, released from the restraints imposed by herbivory, undergo evolutionary radiation in a new adaptive zone; 4. by mutation or recombination, insects evolve mechanisms of resistance to the secondary substances; 5. able to exploit a plant resource hitherto excluded from herbivores, the adapted insects enter a new adaptive zone and undergo their own evolutionary radiation. This scenario was inspired by broad patterns of hostplant utilization among families of butterflies (Rhopalocera). Although the schema gained widespread acceptance, to date no specific example demonstrates most or all of the steps in the sequence. This lack of empirical evidence has been the subject of considerable criticism (e.g., Jermy, 1976; Janzen, 1980). Recent experimental work on associations between various insects and plants containing furanocoumarins and related compounds (Berenbaum, 1978, 1980, 1981a, 1981b, 1981c), however, provides a case study with either direct or circumstantial evidence for each part of the coevolutionary process.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Macroevolution and the biological diversity of plants and herbivores
Futuyma, D. J., & Agrawal, A. A. (2009) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0904106106 · Cited by 632
Escalation of Plant Defense: Do Latex and Resin Canals Spur Plant Diversification?
Farrell, B. D., Dussourd, D. E., & Mitter, C. (1991) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/285258 · Cited by 401
Botanical insecticides inspired by plant–herbivore chemical interactions
Miresmailli, S., & Isman, M. B. (2014) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2013.10.002 · Cited by 379
Knox, J. P., & Dodge, A. D. (1985) · Phytochemistry · doi:10.1016/s0031-9422(00)83147-7 · Cited by 339
Key evolutionary innovations and their ecological mechanisms
Heard, S. B., & Hauser, D. L. (1995) · Historical Biology · doi:10.1080/10292389509380518 · Cited by 280
Metadata
- Authors
- Berenbaum, M.
- Venue
- Evolution
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1983-01
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 163-179
- ISSN
- 0014-3820 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-5646
- OpenAlex
- W2005536513
- Cited by
- 350
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 15.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: COUMARINS AND CATERPILLARS: A CASE FOR COEVOLUTION. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1983.tb05524.x
- The paper
- Berenbaum, M. (1983). COUMARINS AND CATERPILLARS: A CASE FOR COEVOLUTION. Evolution. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1983.tb05524.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.