The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
NATURAL SELECTION ON BEAK AND BODY SIZE IN THE SONG SPARROW
Open accessAbstract
We documented temporal patterns of natural selection on beak and body traits in a song sparrow population. We looked for evidence of selection in association with reproduction and overwinter survival in order to identify the conditions under which size in beak and body traits is adaptive. We also attempted to identify the specific traits most closely associated with fitness under these conditions. Selection was observed in association with both survival and reproduction. Patterns of selection differed between the sexes. Selection on males was weak and stabilizing in association with overwinter survival. Selection on females was strong, was both stabilizing and directional, and was associated with both survival and reproduction. In females, traits that enhanced juvenile survival also reduced reproductive success; i.e., there was a trade-off between survival and reproduction. Patterns of selection in the song sparrow parallel those reported for the Galápagos finch, Geospiza fortis. However, in song sparrows, selection occurred mainly on tarsus length and beak length, and not on beak depth or width as in G. fortis. This difference may occur because most North American sparrows partition food resources by habitat, while most Galápagos ground finches partition food by seed size.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Jackknife, the Bootstrap and Other Resampling Plans
Efron, B. (1982) · Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics eBooks · doi:10.1137/1.9781611970319 · Cited by 8,120
The measurement of selection on correlated characters
Lande, R., & Arnold, S. J. (1983) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1983.tb00236.x · Cited by 5,437
Cited by
PREDICTING MICROEVOLUTIONARY RESPONSES TO DIRECTIONAL SELECTION ON HERITABLE VARIATION
Grant, P. R., & Grant, B. R. (1995) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1995.tb02236.x · Cited by 473
Fleming, I. A., & Gross, M. R. (1994) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1994.tb01350.x · Cited by 346
Livezey, B. C. (2003) · Ornithological Monographs · doi:10.2307/40168337 · Cited by 81
Metadata
- Authors
- Schluter, D., & Smith, J. N. M.
- Venue
- Evolution
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1986-03
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 221-231
- ISSN
- 0014-3820 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1989356611
- Cited by
- 166
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 12.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: NATURAL SELECTION ON BEAK AND BODY SIZE IN THE SONG SPARROW. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1986.tb00465.x
- The paper
- Schluter, D., & Smith, J. N. M. (1986). NATURAL SELECTION ON BEAK AND BODY SIZE IN THE SONG SPARROW. Evolution. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1986.tb00465.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.