The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
SEX‐RATIO MANIPULATION IN COLOR‐BANDED POPULATIONS OF ZEBRA FINCHES
Open accessAbstract
Significant correlations were found between attractiveness of leg-band color (determined by preference tests [Burley et al., 1982]) and sex ratio of offspring in two long-term breeding experiments involving zebra finches. In both experiments, birds with attractive band colors produced more same-sex offspring, while birds with unattractive band colors produced more opposite-sex offspring. The results of these experiments are consistent with those of a previous experiment (Burley, 1981). To explain the earlier results, I hypothesized that parents adjust their allocation to sons and daughters to produce offspring they "expect" to be most attractive. The purpose of such sex-ratio manipulation is to enhance fitness by the production of offspring with superior mate-getting opportunities. Two alternative hypotheses are presented here. One is that sex ratios change with parental age and/or experience. Evidence does not support this hypothesis. There were no temporal trends in sex ratio independent of band color. A second possibility is that sex ratios reflect differential parental ability to rear sons and daughters. This hypothesis cannot be conclusively tested on the basis of present evidence, but available evidence does not support it. Within color classes, weights of sons and daughters did not differ. Evidence indicates that parents effect secondary sex-ratio manipulation through the selective rejection of young, usually within six days of hatching. There is no evidence of manipulation prior to egg-laying. The costs associated with brood reduction probably set limits on the extent to which secondary manipulation can be profitably employed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
On the Evolution of Mating Systems in Birds and Mammals
Orians, G. H. (1969) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/282628 · Cited by 1,511
Cited by
Maternal hormones as a tool to adjust offspring phenotype in avian species
Groothuis, T. G. G., Müller, W., von Engelhardt, N., Carere, C., & Eising, C. (2005) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2004.12.002 · Cited by 872
Constraints in the Evolution of Sex Ratio Adjustment
West, S. A., & Sheldon, B. C. (2002) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1069043 · Cited by 481
Metadata
- Authors
- Burley, N.
- Venue
- Evolution
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1986-11
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1191-1206
- ISSN
- 0014-3820 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-5646
- OpenAlex
- W2086395354
- Cited by
- 175
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: SEX‐RATIO MANIPULATION IN COLOR‐BANDED POPULATIONS OF ZEBRA FINCHES. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1986.tb05744.x
- The paper
- Burley, N. (1986). SEX‐RATIO MANIPULATION IN COLOR‐BANDED POPULATIONS OF ZEBRA FINCHES. Evolution. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1986.tb05744.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.