The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Constraints in the Evolution of Sex Ratio Adjustment
Abstract
When the relative fitness of male and female offspring varies with environmental conditions, evolutionary theory predicts that parents should adjust the sex of their offspring accordingly. Qualitative and even quantitative support for this prediction is striking in some taxa but much less convincing in others. Explaining such variation across taxa in the fit of sex ratio theory remains a major challenge. We use meta-analysis to test the role of two constraints in the evolution of sex ratios. Based on analysis of sex ratio skews in birds and wasps, we show that (i) mechanisms of sex determination do not necessarily constrain the evolution of sex ratio adjustment, and (ii) parental ability to predict their offsprings' environment influences the evolution of sex ratio patterns across taxa. More generally, our results show that multiple constraints may determine the precision of adaptation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Meta-Analytic Procedures for Social Research
Rosenthal, R. (1991) · doi:10.4135/9781412984997 · Cited by 4,635
Meta-Analytic Procedures for Social Research.
Metcalfe, A., & Rosenthal, R. (1994) · The Statistician · doi:10.2307/2348600 · Cited by 4,249
Natural Selection of Parental Ability to Vary the Sex Ratio of Offspring
Trivers, R. L., & Willard, D. E. (1973) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.179.4068.90 · Cited by 3,832
Parasitoids: Behavioral and Evolutionary Ecology
Godfray, H. C. J. (1994) · doi:10.1515/9780691207025 · Cited by 2,605
Parasitoids: behavioral and evolutionary ecology
(1994) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.32-0293 · Cited by 2,593
STATISTICAL ISSUES IN ECOLOGICAL META-ANALYSES
Gurevitch, J., & Hedges, L. V. (1999) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/0012-9658(1999)080[1142:siiema]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 1,081
Sex ratio evolution in a variable environment
Charnov, E. L., Los-den Hartogh, R. L., Jones, W. T., & van den Assem, J. (1981) · Nature · doi:10.1038/289027a0 · Cited by 750
Sex Ratio Variation in Mammals
Clutton-Brock, T. H., & Iason, G. R. (1986) · The Quarterly Review of Biology · doi:10.1086/415033 · Cited by 625
Extreme adaptive modification in sex ratio of the Seychelles warbler's eggs
Komdeur, J., Daan, S., Tinbergen, J., & Mateman, C. (1997) · Nature · doi:10.1038/385522a0 · Cited by 569
Recent studies of avian sex ratios
Sheldon, B. C. (1998) · Heredity · doi:10.1038/sj.hdy.6883740 · Cited by 528
Self-citation
Cited by
Social semantics: altruism, cooperation, mutualism, strong reciprocity and group selection.
WEST, S. A., GRIFFIN, A. S., & GARDNER, A. (2007) · Journal of Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1420-9101.2006.01258.x · Cited by 1,889
Self-citationHandbook of Meta-analysis in Ecology and Evolution
(2013) · doi:10.1515/9781400846184 · Cited by 1,183
A meta‐analysis of preference–performance relationships in phytophagous insects
Gripenberg, S., Mayhew, P. J., Parnell, M., & Roslin, T. (2010) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01433.x · Cited by 892
Metadata
- Authors
- West, S. A., & Sheldon, B. C.
- Venue
- Science
- Published
- 2002-03
- Volume
- 295
- Issue
- 5560
- Pages
- 1685-1688
- ISSN
- 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-9203
- OpenAlex
- W1975595302
- Cited by
- 481
- References
- 26
- FWCI
- 40.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Constraints in the Evolution of Sex Ratio Adjustment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1126/science.1069043
- The paper
- West, S. A., & Sheldon, B. C. (2002). Constraints in the Evolution of Sex Ratio Adjustment. Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1069043
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
