The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
DNA DIVERGENCE AMONG HOMINOIDS
Abstract
We have determined the degree of single-copy DNA divergence among the extant members of the Hominoidea employing the technique of DNA-DNA hybridization. The species studied include humans, two species of chimpanzees, gorillas, two subspecies of orangutans, and two species of gibbons; as an outgroup we have used a member of the Old World monkeys (Cercopithecidae), the baboon. Our methods are different from those previously used and allow us to control for two factors other than base-pair mismatch that can affect the thermal stability of DNA duplexes: the base composition and duplex length. In addition, we have studied more than one individual for most species and thus are able to assess the effect of intraspecific variation on phylogenetic conclusions. The results indicate that the closest extant relatives of humans are the chimpanzees. Gorillas are the next closest, followed by orangutans and gibbons. This result is strongly supported statistically, as there is virtually no overlap in measurements between different taxa. Our conclusions are in agreement with a growing amount of molecular evidence supporting this pattern of relatedness. The data behave as a reasonably good molecular clock, and we do not see an indication of slowdown in molecular evolution in the clade containing humans and African apes, contrary to what has been documented for protein-coding regions. Because of the clocklike nature of the results, we have estimated that the divergence of humans and chimpanzees occurred about 6-8 million years ago. Results from orangutans indicate that the Borneo and Sumatra populations are genetically distinct, about as different as the named species of chimpanzees.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: A maximum likelihood approach.
Felsenstein, J. (1981) · Journal of Molecular Evolution · doi:10.1007/bf01734359 · Cited by 14,571
Dating of the human–ape splitting by a molecular clock of mitochondrial DNA.
Hasegawa, M., Kishino, H., & Yano, T.-A. (1985) · Journal of Molecular Evolution · doi:10.1007/bf02101694 · Cited by 8,687
The molecular clock runs more slowly in man than in apes and monkeys
Li, W.-H., & Tanimura, M. (1987) · Nature · doi:10.1038/326093a0 · Cited by 375
Cited by
Goodman, M., Porter, C. A., Czelusniak, J., Page, S. L., Schneider, H., Shoshani, J., Gunnell, G., & Groves, C. P. (1998) · Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution · doi:10.1006/mpev.1998.0495 · Cited by 743
Evolutionary radiation of visual and olfactory brain systems in primates, bats and insectivores
Barton, R. A., Purvis, A., & Harvey, P. H. (1995) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.1995.0076 · Cited by 352
Lovejoy, C. O., Suwa, G., Simpson, S. W., Matternes, J. H., & White, T. D. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1175833 · Cited by 320
Divergence between samples of chimpanzee and human DNA sequences is 5%, counting indels
Britten, R. J. (2002) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.172510699 · Cited by 296
Steiper, M. E., Young, N. M., & Sukarna, T. Y. (2004) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0407270101 · Cited by 149
Metadata
- Authors
- Caccone, A., & Powell, J. R.
- Venue
- Evolution
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1989-08
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 925-942
- ISSN
- 0014-3820 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-5646
- OpenAlex
- W2059169201
- Cited by
- 202
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 25.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: DNA DIVERGENCE AMONG HOMINOIDS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1989.tb02540.x
- The paper
- Caccone, A., & Powell, J. R. (1989). DNA DIVERGENCE AMONG HOMINOIDS. Evolution. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1989.tb02540.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.