The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
SEXUAL SELECTION BY THE HANDICAP MECHANISM
Abstract
The handicap mechanism of sexual selection by female choice has been strongly criticized because it does not cause sexual selection to reinforce viability selection and it cannot account for the origin of mating preferences. However, several models indicate that the handicap mechanism can have important effects when operating in conjunction with Fisher's mechanism in polygynous populations. These models have been criticized because they require that fitness remains heritable indefinitely. I develop a simple haploid model of the handicap mechanism based on nonheritable variation in paternal investment, thus eliminating the problem of heritable fitness. This model produces the same evolutonary dynamics as both simple and quantitative genetic models of the handicap mechanism based on heritable fitness. If the parameters are such that Fisherian runaway selection does not occur in the null model (i.e., the polymorphic equilibria, which lie along the "Fisher line," are stable), then the handicap mechanism turns the Fisher line into an evolutionary trajectory upon which all other trajectories converge. This occurs because Fisher's mechanism generates no net selection on female preference when the population is on the Fisher line, so that any additional source of selection (direct or indirect) on female choice causes the population to evolve deterministically along the Fisher line. This change in the evolutionary dynamics has the important consequence of eliminating the potential for rapid population divergence for mating systems via genetic drift along the Fisher line.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mate selection—A selection for a handicap
Zahavi, A. (1975) · Journal of Theoretical Biology · doi:10.1016/0022-5193(75)90111-3 · Cited by 5,251
Cited by
The evolution of mating preferences and the paradox of the lek
Kirkpatrick, M., & Ryan, M. J. (1991) · Nature · doi:10.1038/350033a0 · Cited by 1,316
Pathogen prevalence and human mate preferences
Gangestad, S. W., & Buss, D. M. (1993) · Ethology and Sociobiology · doi:10.1016/0162-3095(93)90009-7 · Cited by 521
S., N., W., S., & S., P. (2002) · Journal of Comparative Physiology A: Sensory, Neural, and Behavioral Physiology · doi:10.1007/s00359-002-0361-3 · Cited by 481
Fluctuating asymmetry and sexual selection
Møller, A. P., & Pomiankowski, A. (1994) · Contemporary Issues in Genetics and Evolution · doi:10.1007/978-94-011-0830-0_21 · Cited by 371
Song Function and the Evolution of Female Preferences: Why Birds Sing, Why Brains Matter
NOWICKI, S., & SEARCY, W. A. (2004) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1196/annals.1298.012 · Cited by 230
Metadata
- Authors
- Heywood, J. S.
- Venue
- Evolution
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1989-11
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1387-1397
- ISSN
- 0014-3820 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1983964696
- Cited by
- 182
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: SEXUAL SELECTION BY THE HANDICAP MECHANISM. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1989.tb02590.x
- The paper
- Heywood, J. S. (1989). SEXUAL SELECTION BY THE HANDICAP MECHANISM. Evolution. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1989.tb02590.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.