The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
MEASURING POLLINATOR‐MEDIATED SELECTION ON MORPHOMETRIC FLORAL TRAITS: BUMBLEBEES AND THE ALPINE SKY PILOT, POLEMONIUM VISCOSUM
Abstract
Sweet-flowered plants of Polemonium viscosum in Colorado are visited by a fly-dominated pollinator fauna at timberline (krummholz), but almost exclusively by bumblebees in higher-elevation tundra habitats. Significant increases in flower size and height are associated with increasing elevation along this habitat gradient. This paper presents the results of an experiment designed to test whether bumblebees exert sufficient selection on morphometric floral phenotypes to account for the clinal shifts seen in natural populations. Two populations of sweet-flowered plants of krummholz origin were established: one randomly pollinated, the other solely bumblebee-pollinated. I tested the effects of two independent axes of floral variation, obtained by principal-components analysis, on mean seed set per flower of plants in each population. PC1, with strong correlations to corolla diameter, corolla length, and stem height, explained a significant amount of variance in seed set for bumblebee-pollinated plants but had no bearing on that of randomly pollinated plants. PC2, with strong correlation to flower number, did not influence seed set in either population. Bumblebee behavior was correlated with variation in PC1 scores of the selected population, yielding positive directional selection on morphometric floral traits associated with PC1. Selection coefficients for PC1, corolla length, corolla diameter, and inflorescence height were estimated, respectively, as 0.11, 0.09, 0.07, and 0.06 (P < 0.025 in all cases). These results support the hypothesis that pollinator-mediated selection can bring about changes in floral form, and can explain shifts in floral morphology of P. viscosum along natural habitat gradients.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The measurement of selection on correlated characters
Lande, R., & Arnold, S. J. (1983) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1983.tb00236.x · Cited by 5,437
Cited by
The evolution of plant–insect mutualisms
Bronstein, J. L., Alarcón, R., & Geber, M. (2006) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2006.01864.x · Cited by 538
Niovi Jones, K., & Reithel, J. S. (2001) · American Journal of Botany · doi:10.2307/2657109 · Cited by 286
Herrera, C. M. (1993) · Ecological Monographs · doi:10.2307/2937101 · Cited by 263
Knauer, A. C., & Schiestl, F. P. (2017) · Evolutionary Ecology · doi:10.1007/s10682-016-9878-8 · Cited by 70
Butterflies show flower colour preferences but not constancy in foraging at four plant species
POHL, N. B., VAN WYK, J., & CAMPBELL, D. R. (2011) · Ecological Entomology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2311.2011.01271.x · Cited by 53
Metadata
- Authors
- Galen, C.
- Venue
- Evolution
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1989-07
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 882-890
- ISSN
- 0014-3820 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-5646
- OpenAlex
- W2319951912
- Cited by
- 344
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 13.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: MEASURING POLLINATOR‐MEDIATED SELECTION ON MORPHOMETRIC FLORAL TRAITS: BUMBLEBEES AND THE ALPINE SKY PILOT, POLEMONIUM VISCOSUM. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1989.tb05185.x
- The paper
- Galen, C. (1989). MEASURING POLLINATOR‐MEDIATED SELECTION ON MORPHOMETRIC FLORAL TRAITS: BUMBLEBEES AND THE ALPINE SKY PILOT, POLEMONIUM VISCOSUM. Evolution. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1989.tb05185.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.