The DOI matches its Crossref record; 112 of the 112 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The evolution of plant–insect mutualisms
Open accessAbstract
Summary: Mutualisms (cooperative interactions between species) have had a central role in the generation and maintenance of life on earth. Insects and plants are involved in diverse forms of mutualism. Here we review evolutionary features of three prominent insect–plant mutualisms: pollination, protection and seed dispersal. We focus on addressing five central phenomena: evolutionary origins and maintenance of mutualism; the evolution of mutualistic traits; the evolution of specialization and generalization; coevolutionary processes; and the existence of cheating. Several features uniting very diverse insect–plant mutualisms are identified and their evolutionary implications are discussed: the involvement of one mobile and one sedentary partner; natural selection on plant rewards; the existence of a continuum from specialization to generalization; and the ubiquity of cheating, particularly on the part of insects. Plant–insect mutualisms have apparently both arisen and been lost repeatedly. Many adaptive hypotheses have been proposed to explain these transitions, and it is unlikely that any one of them dominates across interactions differing so widely in natural history. Evolutionary theory has a potentially important, but as yet largely unfilled, role to play in explaining the origins, maintenance, breakdown and evolution of insect–plant mutualisms. ContentsSummary412I.Introduction413IIA historical perspective on mutualism413III.Insect pollination414IV.Protection of plants by ants417V.Ant‐mediated seed dispersal419VI.Discussion420Acknowledgements423References424
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Axelrod, R., & Hamilton, W. D. (1981) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.7466396 · Cited by 20,065
Darwin, C., Burndy Library, Darwin, C., Edmonds & Remnants, & Henry Sotheran Ltd. (1859) · J. Murray eBooks · doi:10.5962/bhl.title.59991 · Cited by 6,984
Darwin, C., Murray, J., Sons, W. C. A., & Evans., B. &. (1859) · doi:10.5962/bhl.title.82303 · Cited by 5,608
Variation and Evolution in Plants
Stebbins, G. L. (1950) · doi:10.7312/steb94536 · Cited by 2,704
Grimaldi, D. A., & Engel, M. S. (2005) · Cited by 2,618
The nested assembly of plant–animal mutualistic networks
Bascompte, J., Jordano, P., Melián, C. J., & Olesen, J. M. (2003) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1633576100 · Cited by 2,497
Pollination Syndromes and Floral Specialization
Fenster, C. B., Armbruster, W. S., Wilson, P., Dudash, M. R., & Thomson, J. D. (2004) · Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.34.011802.132347 · Cited by 2,241
The Geographic Mosaic of Coevolution
Thompson, J. N. (2005) · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226118697.001.0001 · Cited by 2,083
Generalization in Pollination Systems, and Why it Matters
Waser, N. M., Chittka, L., Price, M. V., Williams, N. M., & Ollerton, J. (1996) · Ecology · doi:10.2307/2265575 · Cited by 1,934
SELF-COMPATIBILITY AND ESTABLISHMENT AFTER ‘“LONG-DISTANCE” DISPERSAL
Baker, H. G. (1955) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1955.tb01544.x · Cited by 1,648
Cited by
Beyond society: the evolution of organismality
Queller, D. C., & Strassmann, J. E. (2009) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2009.0095 · Cited by 440
BIOTIC INTERACTIONS AND MACROEVOLUTION: EXTENSIONS AND MISMATCHES ACROSS SCALES AND LEVELS
Jablonski, D. (2008) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00317.x · Cited by 294
Multisensory integration of colors and scents: insights from bees and flowers
Leonard, A. S., & Masek, P. (2014) · Journal of Comparative Physiology A · doi:10.1007/s00359-014-0904-4 · Cited by 161
Why Are the Majority of Active Compounds in the CNS Domain Natural Products? A Critical Analysis
Bharate, S. S., Mignani, S., & Vishwakarma, R. A. (2018) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/acs.jmedchem.7b01922 · Cited by 102
Metadata
- Authors
- Bronstein, J. L., Alarcón, R., & Geber, M.
- Venue
- New Phytologist
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-09-05
- Volume
- 172
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 412-428
- ISSN
- 0028-646X (ISSN-L)
- 1469-8137
- OpenAlex
- W2137714402
- Cited by
- 538
- References
- 112
- FWCI
- 17.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The evolution of plant–insect mutualisms. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2006.01864.x
- The paper
- Bronstein, J. L., Alarcón, R., & Geber, M. (2006). The evolution of plant–insect mutualisms. New Phytologist. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2006.01864.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.