The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
DOES INCREASED MORTALITY FAVOR THE EVOLUTION OF MORE RAPID SENESCENCE?
Abstract
It is widely believed (following the 1957 hypothesis of G. C. Williams) that greater rates of "extrinsic" (age- and condition-independent) mortality favor more rapid senescence. However, a recent analysis of mammalian life tables failed to find a significant correlation between minimum adult mortality rate and the rate of senescence. This article presents a simple theoretical analysis of how extrinsic mortality should affect the rate of senescence (i.e., the rate at which probability of mortality increases with age) under different evolutionary and population dynamical assumptions. If population dynamics are density independent, extrinsic mortality should not alter the senescence rate favored by natural selection. If population growth is density dependent and populations are stable, the effect of extrinsic mortality depends on the age specificity of the density dependence and on whether survival or reproduction (or both) are functions of density. It is possible that higher extrinsic mortality will increase the rate of senescence at all ages, decrease the rate at all ages, or increase it at some ages while decreasing it at others. Williams's hypothesis is most likely to be supported when density dependence acts primarily on fertility and does not differentially decrease the fertilities of older individuals. Patterns contrary to Williams's prediction are possible when density dependence acts primarily on the survival or fertility of later ages or when most variation in mortality rates is due to variation in nonextrinsic mortality.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Comparative Method in Evolutionary Biology
Harvey, P. H., & Pagel, M. D. (1991) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198546412.001.0001 · Cited by 4,337
Pleiotropy, natural selection, and the evolution of senescence
Williams, G. C. (1957) · Evolution · doi:10.2307/2406060 · Cited by 1,912
Cited by
Austad, S. N., & Fischer, K. E. (2016) · Cell Metabolism · doi:10.1016/j.cmet.2016.05.019 · Cited by 593
AGE-SPECIFIC SURVIVAL IN FIVE POPULATIONS OF UNGULATES: EVIDENCE OF SENESCENCE
Loison, A., Festa-Bianchet, M., Gaillard, J.-M., Jorgenson, J. T., & Jullien, J.-M. (1999) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/0012-9658(1999)080[2539:assifp]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 455
Ricklefs, R. E. (1998) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/286147 · Cited by 353
Ellis, B. J., Sheridan, M. A., Belsky, J., & McLaughlin, K. A. (2022) · Development and Psychopathology · doi:10.1017/s0954579421001838 · Cited by 339
Evolution of sex differences in lifespan and aging: causes and constraints
Maklakov, A. A., & Lummaa, V. (2013) · BioEssays · doi:10.1002/bies.201300021 · Cited by 227
Metadata
- Authors
- Abrams, P. A.
- Venue
- Evolution
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1993-06
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 877-887
- ISSN
- 0014-3820 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-5646
- OpenAlex
- W2001040922
- Cited by
- 315
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 2.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: DOES INCREASED MORTALITY FAVOR THE EVOLUTION OF MORE RAPID SENESCENCE? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1993.tb01241.x
- The paper
- Abrams, P. A. (1993). DOES INCREASED MORTALITY FAVOR THE EVOLUTION OF MORE RAPID SENESCENCE? Evolution. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1993.tb01241.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.