The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
PREY ADAPTATION AS A CAUSE OF PREDATOR‐PREY CYCLES
Abstract
We analyze simple models of predator-prey systems in which there is adaptive change in a trait of the prey that determines the rate at which it is captured by searching predators. Two models of adaptive change are explored: (1) change within a single reproducing prey population that has genetic variation for vulnerability to capture by the predator; and (2) direct competition between two independently reproducing prey populations that differ in their vulnerability. When an individual predator's consumption increases at a decreasing rate with prey availability, prey adaptation via either of these mechanisms may produce sustained cycles in both species' population densities and in the prey's mean trait value. Sufficiently rapid adaptive change (e.g., behavioral adaptation or evolution of traits with a large additive genetic variance), or sufficiently low predator birth and death rates will produce sustained cycles or chaos, even when the predator-prey dynamics with fixed prey capture rates would have been stable. Adaptive dynamics can also stabilize a system that would exhibit limit cycles if traits were fixed at their equilibrium values. When evolution fails to stabilize inherently unstable population interactions, selection decreases the prey's escape ability, which further destabilizes population dynamics. When the predator has a linear functional response, evolution of prey vulnerability always promotes stability. The relevance of these results to observed predator-prey cycles is discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Natural selection and random genetic drift in phenotypic evolution
Lande, R. (1976) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1976.tb00911.x · Cited by 1,828
Cited by
Ecological consequences of genetic diversity
Hughes, A. R., Inouye, B. D., Johnson, M. T. J., Underwood, N., & Vellend, M. (2008) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01179.x · Cited by 1,834
Relationships between direct predation and risk effects
Creel, S., & Christianson, D. (2008) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2007.12.004 · Cited by 1,238
The Newest Synthesis: Understanding the Interplay of Evolutionary and Ecological Dynamics
Schoener, T. W. (2011) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1193954 · Cited by 1,037
The Evolution of Predator-Prey Interactions: Theory and Evidence
Abrams, P. A. (2000) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.31.1.79 · Cited by 912
Self-citationEco‐evolutionary dynamics of communities and ecosystems
FUSSMANN, G. F., LOREAU, M., & ABRAMS, P. A. (2007) · Functional Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2435.2007.01275.x · Cited by 578
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Abrams, P. A., & Matsuda, H.
- Venue
- Evolution
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1997-12
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1742-1750
- ISSN
- 0014-3820 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-5646
- OpenAlex
- W2326310646
- Cited by
- 272
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 2.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: PREY ADAPTATION AS A CAUSE OF PREDATOR‐PREY CYCLES. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1997.tb05098.x
- The paper
- Abrams, P. A., & Matsuda, H. (1997). PREY ADAPTATION AS A CAUSE OF PREDATOR‐PREY CYCLES. Evolution. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1997.tb05098.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.