Cited by 1,828Evolution and Genetic DynamicsLanguage and cultural evolutionMorphological variations and asymmetry

Natural selection and random genetic drift in phenotypic evolution

Lande, Russell·1976·Evolution

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1976.tb00911.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Brownian motion model is inconsistent with how we think of the process of adapting to an optimal state.

    “While this model is useful (and has often been used) for testing for adaptation, it is inconsistent with how we think of the process of adapting to an optimal state (Lande 1976;Hansen 1997;Hansen and Orzack 2005;Hansen et al. 2008;Hansen and Bartoszek 2012).”

    From Rethinking phylogenetic comparative methods (2018) · cites this paper as Lande 1976

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lande, R.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Lande, Russell
Venue
Evolution
Published
1976-06
Volume
30
Issue
2
Pages
314-334
ISSN
0014-3820 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1966206981
Cited by
1,828
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 64 · 2025: 82 · 2024: 65 · 2023: 78 · 2022: 72 · 2021: 67 · 2020: 55 · 2019: 132 · 2018: 71 · 2017: 67 · 2016: 70 · 2015: 76 · 2014: 56 · 2013: 69 · 2012: 54
FWCI
4.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Evolution (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Language and cultural evolution
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Geometry and Topology › Morphological variations and asymmetry
Keywords
natural selection, genetic drift, phenotypic evolution, evolutionary change

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review