The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
CORRELATION OF PAIRWISE GENETIC AND GEOGRAPHIC DISTANCE MEASURES: INFERRING THE RELATIVE INFLUENCES OF GENE FLOW AND DRIFT ON THE DISTRIBUTION OF GENETIC VARIABILITY
Open accessAbstract
Attempts to relate estimates of regional FST to gene flow and drift via Wright's (1931) equation FST ≈ 1/ (4Nm + 1) are often inappropriate because most natural sets of populations probably are not at equilibrium (McCauley 1993), as assumed by the island model upon which the equation is based, or ineffective because the influences of gene flow and drift are confounded in the product Nm. Evaluations of the association between genetic (FST) and geographic distances separating all pairwise populations combinations in a region allows one to test for regional equilibrium, to evaluate the relative influences of gene flow and drift on population structure both within and between regions, and to visualize the behavior of the association across all degrees of geographic separation. Tests of the model using microsatellite data from 51 populations of eastern collared lizards (Crotaphytus collaris collaris) collected from four distinct geographical regions gave results highly consistent with predicted patterns of association based on regional differences in various historical and ecological factors that affect the amount of drift and gene flow. The model provides a prerequisite for and an alternative to regional FST analyses, which often simply assume regional equilibrium, thus potentially leading to erroneous and misleading inferences regarding regional population structure.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Environmental correlates of population differentiation in Atlantic herring
Bekkevold, D., Aandré3, C., Dahlgren, T. G., Clausen, L. A. W., Torstensen, E., Mosegaard, H., Carvalho, G. R., Christensen, T. B., Norlinder, E., & Ruzzante, D. E. (2005) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.0014-3820.2005.tb00977.x · Cited by 1,223
The genetic consequences of habitat fragmentation
Templeton, A. R., Shaw, K., Routman, E., & Davis, S. K. (1990) · Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden · doi:10.2307/2399621 · Cited by 453
Self-citation
Cited by
Beyond biogeographic patterns: processes shaping the microbial landscape
Hanson, C. A., Fuhrman, J. A., Horner-Devine, M. C., & Martiny, J. B. H. (2012) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro2795 · Cited by 1,739
McRae, B. H. (2006) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.0014-3820.2006.tb00500.x · Cited by 1,081
Circuit theory predicts gene flow in plant and animal populations
McRae, B. H., & Beier, P. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0706568104 · Cited by 945
Statistical phylogeography: methods of evaluating and minimizing inference errors
Templeton, A. R. (2004) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-294x.2003.02041.x · Cited by 746
Self-citationOrsini, L., Vanoverbeke, J., Swillen, I., Mergeay, J., & De Meester, L. (2013) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/mec.12561 · Cited by 494
Metadata
- Authors
- Hutchison, D. W., & Templeton, A. R.
- Venue
- Evolution
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1999-12
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1898-1914
- ISSN
- 0014-3820 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-5646
- OpenAlex
- W2331810358
- Cited by
- 1,106
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 10.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: CORRELATION OF PAIRWISE GENETIC AND GEOGRAPHIC DISTANCE MEASURES: INFERRING THE RELATIVE INFLUENCES OF GENE FLOW AND DRIFT ON THE DISTRIBUTION OF GENETIC VARIABILITY. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1999.tb04571.x
- The paper
- Hutchison, D. W., & Templeton, A. R. (1999). CORRELATION OF PAIRWISE GENETIC AND GEOGRAPHIC DISTANCE MEASURES: INFERRING THE RELATIVE INFLUENCES OF GENE FLOW AND DRIFT ON THE DISTRIBUTION OF GENETIC VARIABILITY. Evolution. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1999.tb04571.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.