Hybrid male sterility in Mimulus (Phrymaceae) is associated with a geographically restricted mitochondrial rearrangement
Abstract
Cytoplasmic male sterility (CMS) and nuclear fertility restoration (Rf) involves intergenomic coevolution. Although male-sterile phenotypes are rarely expressed in natural populations of angiosperms, CMS genes are thought to be common. The evolutionary dynamics of CMS/Rf systems are poorly understood, leaving gaps in our understanding of mechanisms and consequences of cytonuclear interactions. We characterized the molecular basis and geographic distribution of a CMS gene in Mimulus guttatus. We used outcrossing M. guttatus (with CMS and Rf) to self-fertilizing M. nasutus (lacking CMS and Rf) to generate hybrids segregating for CMS. Mitochondrial transcripts containing an essential gene (nad6) were perfectly associated with male sterility. The CMS mitotype was completely absent in M. nasutus, present in all genotypes collected from the original collection site, but in only two individuals from 34 other M. guttatus populations. This pattern suggests that the CMS likely originated at a single locality, spread to fixation within the population, but has not spread to other populations, indicating possible ecological or genetic constraints on dispersal of this CMS mitotype between populations. Extreme localization may be characteristic of CMS in hermaphroditic species, in contrast to geographically widespread mitotypes commonly found in gynodioecious species, and could directly contribute to hybrid incompatibilities in nature.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Incompatibilities resulting from the spread of selfish genetic elements, such as cytoplasmic male sterility, typically appear to be a consequence of new mutations.
“Likewise, incompatibilities resulting from the spread of selfish genetic elements, such as cytoplasmic male sterility, typically appear to be a consequence of new mutations (Case and Willis, 2008; Rieseberg and Blackman, 2010).”
From Genomics of plant speciation (2023) · cites this paper as Case and Willis, 2008
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Rieseberg, L. H., & Blackman, B. K. (2010) · Annals of Botany · doi:10.1093/aob/mcq126 · Cited by 341 · see citing works
Speciation and introgression between Mimulus nasutus and Mimulus guttatus
Brandvain, Y., Kenney, A. M., Flagel, L., Coop, G., & Sweigart, A. L. (2014) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1004410 · Cited by 259 · see citing works
The polymorphic prelude to Bateson–Dobzhansky–Muller incompatibilities
Cutter, A. D. (2012) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2011.11.004 · Cited by 220 · see citing works
When two rights make a wrong: the evolutionary genetics of plant hybrid incompatibilities
Fishman, L., & Sweigart, A. L. (2018) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev-arplant-042817-040113 · Cited by 117 · see citing works
Bock, D. G., Cai, Z., Elphinstone, C., González-Segovia, E., Hirabayashi, K., Huang, K., Keais, G. L., Kim, A., Owens, G. L., & Rieseberg, L. H. (2023) · Plant Communications · doi:10.1016/j.xplc.2023.100599 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
“Likewise, incompatibilities resulting from the spread of selfish genetic elements, such as cytoplasmic male sterility, typically appear to be a consequence of new mutations (Case and Willis, 2008; Rieseberg and Blackman, 2010).”
Gene duplicates cause hybrid lethality between sympatric species of Mimulus
Zuellig, M. P., & Sweigart, A. L. (2018) · PLOS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1007130 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Reproductive isolation and introgression between sympatric<i>Mimulus</i>species
Kenney, A. M., & Sweigart, A. L. (2016) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/mec.13630 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Kerwin, R. E., & Sweigart, A. L. (2017) · G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics · doi:10.1534/g3.117.300148 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
- Authors
- Case, A. L., & Willis, J. H.
- Affiliations
- Duke University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Case, Andrea L.
- Venue
- Evolution
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2008-05
- Volume
- 62
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1026-1039
- ISSN
- 0014-3820 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-5646
- OpenAlex
- W2091110471
- Cited by
- 92
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 9
- FWCI
- 9.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Evolution (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- BioOne Complete (BioOne) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (0328636)
- National Evolutionary Synthesis Center
- Kent State University
- Joint Genome Institute
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Plant Reproductive Biology
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
- Keywords
- cytoplasmic male sterility, Mimulus guttatus, nad6, cytonuclear interactions, hybrid incompatibility, hybridization
- MeSH terms
- RNA, Mitochondrial, Base Sequence, Breeding, Chimera, DNA, Mitochondrial, Geography, Molecular Sequence Data, Phenotype, Recombination, Genetic, RNA, Open Reading Frames, Genes, Essential, Gene Duplication, Mimulus, Genes, Mitochondrial, Plant Infertility
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review