The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
INBREEDING DEPRESSION INCREASES WITH ENVIRONMENTAL STRESS: AN EXPERIMENTAL STUDY AND META-ANALYSIS: INBREEDING LOAD INCREASES WITH STRESS
Abstract
Inbreeding-environment interactions occur when inbreeding leads to differential fitness loss in different environments. Inbred individuals are often more sensitive to environmental stress than are outbred individuals, presumably because stress increases the expression of deleterious recessive alleles or cellular safeguards against stress are pushed beyond the organism's physiological limits. We examined inbreeding-environment interactions, along two environmental axes (temperature and rearing host) that differ in the amount of developmental stress they impose, in the seed-feeding beetle Callosobruchus maculatus. We found that inbreeding depression (inbreeding load, L) increased with the stressfulness of the environment, with the magnitude of stress explaining as much as 66% of the variation in inbreeding depression. This relationship between L and developmental stress was not explainable by an increase in phenotypic variation in more stressful environments. To examine the generality of this experimental result, we conducted a meta-analysis of the available data from published studies looking at stress and inbreeding depression. The meta-analysis confirmed that the effect of the environment on inbreeding depression scales linearly with the magnitude of stress; a population suffers one additional lethal equivalent, on average, for each 30% reduction in fitness induced by the stressful environment. Studies using less-stressful environments may lack statistical power to detect the small changes in inbreeding depression. That the magnitude of inbreeding depression scales with the magnitude of the stress applied has numerous repercussions for evolutionary and conservation genetics and may invigorate research aimed at finding the causal mechanism involved in such a relationship.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Burnham, K. P., & Anderson, D. R. (1998) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-2917-7 · Cited by 3,387
Cited by
Understanding Inbreeding Depression, Purging, and Genetic Rescue
Hedrick, P. W., & Garcia-Dorado, A. (2016) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2016.09.005 · Cited by 668
Genetic erosion impedes adaptive responses to stressful environments
Bijlsma, R., & Loeschcke, V. (2012) · Evolutionary Applications · doi:10.1111/j.1752-4571.2011.00214.x · Cited by 345
Conservation and the Genomics of Populations
Allendorf, F. W., Funk, W. C., Aitken, S. N., Byrne, M., Luikart, G., & Antunes, A. (2022) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198856566.001.0001 · Cited by 207
Secondary extinctions of biodiversity
Brodie, J. F., Aslan, C. E., Rogers, H. S., Redford, K. H., Maron, J. L., Bronstein, J. L., & Groves, C. R. (2014) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2014.09.012 · Cited by 188
de Boer, R. A., Eens, M., Fransen, E., & Müller, W. (2015) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/evo.12625 · Cited by 19
Metadata
- Authors
- Fox, C. W., & Reed, D. H.
- Venue
- Evolution
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2010-09-15
- Volume
- 65
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 246-258
- ISSN
- 0014-3820 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1820637423
- Cited by
- 477
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 10.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: INBREEDING DEPRESSION INCREASES WITH ENVIRONMENTAL STRESS: AN EXPERIMENTAL STUDY AND META-ANALYSIS: INBREEDING LOAD INCREASES WITH STRESS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1558-5646.2010.01108.x
- The paper
- Fox, C. W., & Reed, D. H. (2011). INBREEDING DEPRESSION INCREASES WITH ENVIRONMENTAL STRESS: AN EXPERIMENTAL STUDY AND META-ANALYSIS: INBREEDING LOAD INCREASES WITH STRESS. Evolution. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.2010.01108.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.