The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
PROGRESS TOWARD A GENERAL SPECIES CONCEPT
Abstract
New insights in the speciation process and the nature of "species" that accumulated in the past decade demand adjustments of the species concept. The standing of some of the most broadly accepted or most innovative species concepts in the light of the growing evidence that reproductive barriers are semipermeable to gene flow, that species can differentiate despite ongoing interbreeding, that a single species can originate polyphyletically by parallel evolution, and that uniparental organisms are organised in units that resemble species of biparental organisms is discussed. As a synthesis of ideas in existing concepts and the new insights, a generalization of the genic concept is proposed that defines species as groups of individuals that are reciprocally characterized by features that would have negative fitness effects in other groups and that cannot be regularly exchanged between groups upon contact. The benefits of this differential fitness species concept are that it classifies groups that keep differentiated and keep on differentiating despite interbreeding as species, that it is not restricted to specific mutations or mechanisms causing speciation, and that it can be applied to the whole spectrum of organisms from uni- to biparentals.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mayr, E. (1963) · doi:10.4159/harvard.9780674865327 · Cited by 10,175
Hybridization as an invasion of the genome
Mallet, J. (2005) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2005.02.010 · Cited by 2,196
Chromosomal rearrangements and speciation
Rieseberg, L. H. (2001) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/s0169-5347(01)02187-5 · Cited by 1,457
Wu, C.-I., & Ting, C.-T. (2004) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg1269 · Cited by 532
caos software for use in character‐based DNA barcoding
SARKAR, I. N., PLANET, P. J., & DESALLE, R. (2008) · Molecular Ecology Resources · doi:10.1111/j.1755-0998.2008.02235.x · Cited by 169
Cited by
Implications of different species concepts for conserving biodiversity
Frankham, R., Ballou, J. D., Dudash, M. R., Eldridge, M. D. B., Fenster, C. B., Lacy, R. C., Mendelson, J. R., Porton, I. J., Ralls, K., & Ryder, O. A. (2012) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2012.04.034 · Cited by 355
Hume, B. C. C., D'Angelo, C., Smith, E. G., Stevens, J. R., Burt, J., & Wiedenmann, J. (2015) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep08562 · Cited by 326
A population genetics view of animal domestication
Larson, G., & Burger, J. (2013) · Trends in Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.tig.2013.01.003 · Cited by 294
Thornhill, D. J., Lewis, A. M., Wham, D. C., & LaJeunesse, T. C. (2014) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/evo.12270 · Cited by 274
Conservation and the Genomics of Populations
Allendorf, F. W., Funk, W. C., Aitken, S. N., Byrne, M., Luikart, G., & Antunes, A. (2022) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198856566.001.0001 · Cited by 207
Metadata
- Authors
- Hausdorf, B.
- Venue
- Evolution
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2011-02-15
- Volume
- 65
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 923-931
- ISSN
- 0014-3820 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1976797575
- Cited by
- 317
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 16.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: PROGRESS TOWARD A GENERAL SPECIES CONCEPT. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01231.x
- The paper
- Hausdorf, B. (2011). PROGRESS TOWARD A GENERAL SPECIES CONCEPT. Evolution. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01231.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.