The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Penile Tumescence and Perceptual Responses to Rape as a Function of Victim's Perceived Reactions1
Abstract
Seventy‐five male students participated in an experiment designed to address two interrelated issues. The first concerned conflicting findings regarding nondeviants' sexual responsiveness to rape depictions. In the present experiment, a rape portrayal in which the assailant perceived that the victim became sexually aroused was found to result in high sexual arousal (as indicated by penile tumescence) in comparison to a rape emphasizing the victim's abhorrence of the assault. These differences would appear to successfully reconcile earlier conflicting data. In addressing the second issue, it was found that exposures that portrayed rape in a relatively negative or “positive” manner affected subsequent reactions to rape. More specifically, sexual responsiveness to rape was inhibited following an earlier exposure to a depiction emphasizing a rape victim's abhorrence, while undesirable cognitive‐perceptual changes occurred as a result of exposure to a rape depiction portraying the victim as sexually aroused. Further, self‐reported possibility of engaging in rape was found to correlate with callous attitudes to rape and with selfreported sexual arousal to violent sexuality in a predicted pattern.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bem, D. J. (1972) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60024-6 · Cited by 5,241
Cited by
Pornography, Men Possessing Women
Winship, J., Dworkin, A., & Griffin, S. (1982) · Feminist Review · doi:10.2307/1394830 · Cited by 1,515
Agreement of self-reported and genital measures of sexual arousal in men and women: a meta-analysis.
Chivers, M. L., Seto, M. C., Lalumière, M. L., Laan, E., & Grimbos, T. (2010) · Archives of Sexual Behavior · doi:10.1007/s10508-009-9556-9 · Cited by 584
The effects of mass media exposure on acceptance of violence against women: A field experiment
Malamuth, N. M., & Check, J. V. P. (1981) · Journal of Research in Personality · doi:10.1016/0092-6566(81)90040-4 · Cited by 386
Self-citationSex role stereotyping and reactions to depictions of stranger versus acquaintance rape.
Check, J. V., & Malamuth, N. M. (1983) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.45.2.344 · Cited by 379
Self-citationThe Explicit and Implicit Use of the Scripting Perspective in Sex Research
Gagnon, J. H. (1990) · Annual Review of Sex Research · doi:10.1080/10532528.1990.10559854 · Cited by 347
Metadata
- Authors
- Malamuth, N. M., & Check, J. V. P.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Social Psychology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1980-12
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 528-547
- ISSN
- 0021-9029 (ISSN-L)
- 1559-1816
- OpenAlex
- W1981292509
- Cited by
- 183
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 20.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Penile Tumescence and Perceptual Responses to Rape as a Function of Victim's Perceived Reactions1. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1980.tb00730.x
- The paper
- Malamuth, N. M., & Check, J. V. P. (1980). Penile Tumescence and Perceptual Responses to Rape as a Function of Victim's Perceived Reactions1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1980.tb00730.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.