Social Dominance Orientation, Hierarchy Attenuators and Hierarchy Enhancers: Social Dominance Theory and the Criminal Justice System
Abstract
This study investigated differences in social dominance orientation between incumbents of different social roles (police officers vs. public defenders) and ethnic groups known to differ in general social status (i.e., whites vs. blacks and Hispanics). Consistent with theoretical expectations: (a) Police were significantly more social‐dominance oriented than either jurors or public defenders. (b) Public defenders tended to be less social‐dominance oriented than jurors. (c) Euro‐Americans were significantly more social dominance oriented than Afro‐ and Hispanic‐Americans, (d) Euro‐American police officers had, by far, the highest levels of social dominance orientation. Furthermore, all of the effects above held even when controlling for demographic factors such as gender, social class, age, education, and ethnic group. The theoretical implications of these findings are discussed.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Certain traits linked to negative treatment of racial and ethnic minority groups are more common among police officers than other individuals, such as right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation.
“In fact, certain traits that are linked to negative treatment of racial and ethnic minority groups are more common among police of fi cers than other individuals (e.g., right-wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation”
From A call to dismantle systemic racism in criminal legal systems. (2022) · cites this paper as Sidanius et al., 1994
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Psychological Perspectives on Legitimacy and Legitimation
Tyler, T. R. (2006) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190038 · Cited by 2,381 · see citing works
8 Social Hierarchy: The Self‐Reinforcing Nature of Power and Status
Magee, J. C., & Galinsky, A. D. (2008) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/19416520802211628 · Cited by 2,385 · see citing works
A call to dismantle systemic racism in criminal legal systems.
Najdowski, C. J., & Stevenson, M. C. (2022) · Law and Human Behavior · doi:10.1037/lhb0000510 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
“In fact, certain traits that are linked to negative treatment of racial and ethnic minority groups are more common among police officers than others (e.g., right-wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation; Gatto et al., 2010; Sidanius et al., 1994; Hall et al., 2016).”
Background
- Authors
- Sidanius, J., Liu, J. H., Shaw, J. S., & Pratto, F.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Los Angeles (US)
- Corresponding author
- Sidanius, Jim
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Social Psychology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1994-02
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 338-366
- ISSN
- 0021-9029 (ISSN-L)
- 1559-1816
- OpenAlex
- W2062190594
- Cited by
- 244
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 18.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Applied Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Power and Status Dynamics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Policing Practices and Perceptions
- Keywords
- social dominance orientation, social dominance theory, police officers, public defenders, jury members, racial differences, ethnic differences, criminal justice system
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review