Cited by 244Social and Intergroup PsychologySocial Power and Status DynamicsPolicing Practices and Perceptions

Social Dominance Orientation, Hierarchy Attenuators and Hierarchy Enhancers: Social Dominance Theory and the Criminal Justice System

Sidanius, Jim, Liu, James H., Shaw, John S., Pratto, Felicia·1994·Journal of Applied Social Psychology

Abstract

This study investigated differences in social dominance orientation between incumbents of different social roles (police officers vs. public defenders) and ethnic groups known to differ in general social status (i.e., whites vs. blacks and Hispanics). Consistent with theoretical expectations: (a) Police were significantly more social‐dominance oriented than either jurors or public defenders. (b) Public defenders tended to be less social‐dominance oriented than jurors. (c) Euro‐Americans were significantly more social dominance oriented than Afro‐ and Hispanic‐Americans, (d) Euro‐American police officers had, by far, the highest levels of social dominance orientation. Furthermore, all of the effects above held even when controlling for demographic factors such as gender, social class, age, education, and ethnic group. The theoretical implications of these findings are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1994.tb00586.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Certain traits linked to negative treatment of racial and ethnic minority groups are more common among police officers than other individuals, such as right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation.

    “In fact, certain traits that are linked to negative treatment of racial and ethnic minority groups are more common among police of fi cers than other individuals (e.g., right-wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation”

    From A call to dismantle systemic racism in criminal legal systems. (2022) · cites this paper as Sidanius et al., 1994

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sidanius, J., Liu, J. H., Shaw, J. S., & Pratto, F.
Affiliations
University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Corresponding author
Sidanius, Jim
Venue
Journal of Applied Social Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1994-02
Volume
24
Issue
4
Pages
338-366
ISSN
  • 0021-9029 (ISSN-L)
  • 1559-1816
OpenAlex
W2062190594
Cited by
244
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 5
FWCI
18.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Applied Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Power and Status Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Policing Practices and Perceptions
Keywords
social dominance orientation, social dominance theory, police officers, public defenders, jury members, racial differences, ethnic differences, criminal justice system

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review