Black and White Tokens in Academia: A Difference of Chronic Versus Acute Distinctiveness1
Abstract
Token status effects, also called distinctiveness, include feelings of racial/gender awareness, representativeness, and accountability. In this multimethod three‐part research, it is argued that Black students in a predominantly White university feel chronically distinctive, whereas White students may feel acutely distinctive when they are in the numerical minority. However, this acute distinctiveness is situation specific. First a pilot study confirmed that Black and White females differ in their reports of distinctiveness. Study 1 showed that Black students feel chronically distinctive and that they are often “solos” in classrooms. Study 2 tried to separate race and solo status effects on distinctiveness by experimentally manipulating group solo status. Results indicate a main effect for solo status and also a main effect for race on feelings of distinctiveness across solo conditions. Applications of this research for the token literature and for distinctiveness theory are discussed.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The solo experience may often be associated with self-consciousness regarding one's English skills and/or the experience of racial/cultural social rejection.
“this suggests that the ''solo'' experience may be often be associated with self-consciousness regarding one's English skills and/or the experience of racial/cultural social rejection (Pollak & Niemann, 1998).”
From Bicultural Identity Integration (BII): Components and Psychosocial Antecedents (2005) · cites this paper as Pollak & Niemann, 1998
Cites
Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans.
Steele, C. M., & Aronson, J. (1995) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.69.5.797 · Cited by 8,181 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bicultural Identity Integration (BII): Components and Psychosocial Antecedents
Benet‐Martínez, V., & Haritatos, J. (2005) · Journal of Personality · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2005.00337.x · Cited by 1,384 · see citing works
Dasgupta, N. (2011) · Psychological Inquiry · doi:10.1080/1047840x.2011.607313 · Cited by 466 · see citing works
- Authors
- Pollak, K. I., & Niemann, Y. F.
- Affiliations
- Washington State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Pollak, Kathryn I.
- ORCID
- Pollak, Kathryn I.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Social Psychology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1998-06
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 954-972
- ISSN
- 0021-9029 (ISSN-L)
- 1559-1816
- OpenAlex
- W2115324884
- Cited by
- 49
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 2.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Applied Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Critical Race Theory in Education
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
- Keywords
- tokenism, distinctiveness, Black students, white students, predominantly white universities, minority status, racial consciousness, gender awareness, representativeness, accountability
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review