Cited by 49Social and Intergroup PsychologyCritical Race Theory in EducationRacial and Ethnic Identity Research

Black and White Tokens in Academia: A Difference of Chronic Versus Acute Distinctiveness1

Pollak, Kathryn I., Niemann, Yolanda Flores·1998·Journal of Applied Social Psychology

Abstract

Token status effects, also called distinctiveness, include feelings of racial/gender awareness, representativeness, and accountability. In this multimethod three‐part research, it is argued that Black students in a predominantly White university feel chronically distinctive, whereas White students may feel acutely distinctive when they are in the numerical minority. However, this acute distinctiveness is situation specific. First a pilot study confirmed that Black and White females differ in their reports of distinctiveness. Study 1 showed that Black students feel chronically distinctive and that they are often “solos” in classrooms. Study 2 tried to separate race and solo status effects on distinctiveness by experimentally manipulating group solo status. Results indicate a main effect for solo status and also a main effect for race on feelings of distinctiveness across solo conditions. Applications of this research for the token literature and for distinctiveness theory are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1998.tb01662.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The solo experience may often be associated with self-consciousness regarding one's English skills and/or the experience of racial/cultural social rejection.

    “this suggests that the ''solo'' experience may be often be associated with self-consciousness regarding one's English skills and/or the experience of racial/cultural social rejection (Pollak & Niemann, 1998).”

    From Bicultural Identity Integration (BII): Components and Psychosocial Antecedents (2005) · cites this paper as Pollak & Niemann, 1998

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Authors
Pollak, K. I., & Niemann, Y. F.
Affiliations
Washington State University (US)
Corresponding author
Pollak, Kathryn I.
Venue
Journal of Applied Social Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1998-06
Volume
28
Issue
11
Pages
954-972
ISSN
  • 0021-9029 (ISSN-L)
  • 1559-1816
OpenAlex
W2115324884
Cited by
49
References
1
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Applied Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Critical Race Theory in Education
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
Keywords
tokenism, distinctiveness, Black students, white students, predominantly white universities, minority status, racial consciousness, gender awareness, representativeness, accountability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review