Cited by 224Gambling Behavior and TreatmentsGrit, Self-Efficacy, and MotivationRecreation, Leisure, Wilderness Management

Passion and Gambling: Investigating the Divergent Affective and Cognitive Consequences of Gambling1

Mageau, Genevieve A., Vallerand, Robert J., Rousseau, Franclois L., Ratelle, Catherine F., Provencher, Pierre J.·2005·Journal of Applied Social Psychology

Abstract

Vallerand et al. (2003) developed a theoretical framework of passion where two types of passions are proposed: obsessive and harmonious passion. Obsessive passion is characterized by an internal pressure that pushes the person to engage in the passionate activity, whereas harmonious passion is characterized by the person's choice to engage in the activity. The goal of the present study was to examine the outcomes of these types of passion toward gambling. A total of 554 participants completed instruments assessing their passion toward gambling, as well as several cognitive and affective outcomes. Results indicated that, in general, harmonious passion was associated with positive outcomes, while obsessive passion was related to negative consequences. Results also showed that casino activities accentuated both positive and negative outcomes by fostering both types of passion toward the gambling activity. Conceptual and practical implications are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2005.tb02095.x

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Harmonious passion leads to regular engagement in the passionate activity that translates into positive affect during activity engagement.

    “harmonious passion leads to regular engagement in the passionate activity that translates into positive affect during activity engagement (e.g., Mageau et al. 2005; Vallerand et al. 2003, Study 1; Vallerand et al. 2006, Studies 2 and 3)”

    From The role of passion in sustainable psychological well-being (2012) · cites this paper as Mageau et al. 2005

  • Harmonious passion for gambling has typically been found to be positively related mainly to positive affective experiences while gambling such as pleasure, fun, and enjoyment.

    “harmonious passion for gambling has typically been found to be positively related mainly to positive affective experiences while gambling such as pleasure, fun, and enjoyment (see Mageau et al. 2005)”

    From The role of passion in sustainable psychological well-being (2012) · cites this paper as Mageau et al. 2005

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mageau, G. A., Vallerand, R. J., Rousseau, F. L., Ratelle, C. F., & Provencher, P. J.
Affiliations
Université du Québec à Montréal (CA)
Corresponding author
Vallerand, Robert J.
Venue
Journal of Applied Social Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-01
Volume
35
Issue
1
Pages
100-118
ISSN
  • 0021-9029 (ISSN-L)
  • 1559-1816
OpenAlex
W2135944935
Cited by
224
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 10
FWCI
7.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Applied Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Gambling Behavior and Treatments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Grit, Self-Efficacy, and Motivation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Recreation, Leisure, Wilderness Management
Keywords
passion, gambling, obsessive passion, harmonious passion, affective consequences, cognitive effects, casino gambling, gambling outcomes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review