Simultaneous Measurement of Gastric Emptying of A Solid Meal by Ultrasound and by Scintigraphy
Abstract
Objective Although ultrasonic imaging may represent a valid alternative to scintigraphy for measurement of gastric emptying, most studies comparing the two methods have been carried out with liquid meals. The aim of this study was to compare scintigraphic and ultrasonographic measurements of gastric emptying of a solid meal in healthy subjects and in patients with possible delay in emptying. Methods Nineteen subjects were studied: five controls, six patients with gastroesophageal reflux, and eight patients with dysmotility-like dyspepsia. Gastric emptying was measured by both scintigraphy and ultrasonography after ingestion of an 800-calorie solid, realistic meal containing 99mTc-labeled chicken liver. Scintigraphic measurements were made every 15 min for 6 h, and ultrasonic imaging of antral sections was undertaken every 15 min for the first 1 h and every 30 min thereafter. Total emptying times were calculated independently using the two methods, and the emptying patterns recorded by the two methods were compared. Results Maximal antral dilation occurred 30 min (range 0-90 min) after the end of the meal and persisted until 96 +/- 42 min, by which time gastric radioactivity had decreased from its maximum by 43% +/- 23%. From this time on, the antral cross-sectional area returned toward the basal value, declining faster than the gastric counts recorded by scintigraphy. Total emptying times measured by ultrasound and by scintigraphy were in good agreement in all subjects, with…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Advanced techniques, including antroduodenal‐jejunal manometry, wireless motility capsule, gastric ultrasound, and high‐resolution electrogastrography (EGG), may provide additional pathophysiological insight, particularly in complex or mixed‐pattern cases.
“Advanced techniques, including antroduodenal‑jejunal manometry [71–75], wireless motility capsule [76–79], gastric ultrasound [80–82], and high‑resolution electrogastrography (EGG) [83–87] may provide additional pathophysiological insight, particularly in complex or mixed‑pattern cases.”
From Diabetic gastroparesis: pathophysiology and impact on insulin timing choices (2026) · cites this paper as [80]
Cites
STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT
Martin Bland, J., & Altman, D. (1986) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(86)90837-8 · Cited by 47,965 · see citing works
Role of the proximal and distal stomach in mixed solid and liquid meal emptying
Collins, P. J., Houghton, L. A., Read, N. W., Horowitz, M., Chatterton, B. E., Heddle, R., & Dent, J. (1991) · Gut · doi:10.1136/gut.32.6.615 · Cited by 175 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The role of small intestinal bacterial overgrowth in Parkinson's disease
Fasano, A., Bove, F., Gabrielli, M., Petracca, M., Zocco, M. A., Ragazzoni, E., Barbaro, F., Piano, C., Fortuna, S., Tortora, A., et al. (2013) · Movement Disorders · doi:10.1002/mds.25522 · Cited by 344 · see citing works
Colonic fermentation of indigestible carbohydrates contributes to the second-meal effect
Brighenti, F., Benini, L., Del Rio, D., Casiraghi, C., Pellegrini, N., Scazzina, F., Jenkins, D. J., & Vantini, I. (2006) · The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1093/ajcn/83.4.817 · Cited by 213 · see citing works
Self-citationDiabetic gastroparesis: pathophysiology and impact on insulin timing choices
Galeano, F., Tumminia, A., Oteri, V., Le Moli, R., Piticchio, T., Scilletta, S., Di Marco, M., Di Pino, A., & Frasca, F. (2026) · Endocrine · doi:10.1007/s12020-026-04693-6
“Advanced techniques, including antroduodenal-jejunal manometry [71–75], wireless motility capsule [76–79], gastric ultrasound [80–82], and high-resolution electrogas-trography (EGG) [83–87] may provide additional pathophysiological insight, particularly in complex or mixed-pattern cases.”
- Authors
- Benini, L., Sembenini, C., Heading, R. C., Giorgetti, P. G., Montemezzi, S., Zamboni, M., De Benedetto, P., Brighenti, F., & Vantini, I.
- Affiliations
- University of Verona (IT)
- Edinburgh Royal Infirmary (GB)
- University of Milan (IT)
- Corresponding author
- Benini, L
- Venue
- American Journal of Gastroenterology
- Published
- 1999-10
- Volume
- 94
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 2861-2865
- ISSN
- 0002-9270 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2070346559
- Cited by
- 88
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2
- FWCI
- 2.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The American Journal of Gastroenterology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and Treatment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Enhanced Recovery After Surgery
- Keywords
- gastric emptying, solid meal, gastric ultrasound, scintigraphy, antral cross-sectional area, gastroesophageal reflux, dyspepsia, gastric dysmotility, method comparison
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Dyspepsia, Female, Food, Gastric Emptying, Gastroesophageal Reflux, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Radionuclide Imaging, Stomach, Ultrasonography
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review