Detection of Upper Gastrointestinal Blood With Fecal Occult Blood Tests
Abstract
Objective Although fecal occult blood (FOB) tests have most often been used to detect occult bleeding from the lower gastrointestinal (GI) tract, their utility in detecting occult blood loss from the upper GI tract is less well understood. The aims of this study were to determine whether small amounts of blood from the upper GI tract can be detected by currently available FOB tests and, if so, to correlate FOB tests with semiquantitative GI blood. Methods Groups of 10 healthy volunteers without a history of GI disease drank 5, 10, or 20 ml of their own blood mixed with tomato juice for 5 or 3 consecutive days. Standard dietary and medication restrictions were observed. Consecutive stools were tested for 2 days before, as well as 4 days after, blood ingestion. Each stool was simultaneously tested for FOB with HemoQuant (HQ), Hemoccult II (HO II), Hemoccult II SENSA (SENSA), HemeSelect (HS), and FlexSure OBT (FS). Results The mean age and hemoglobin concentration of the study population were 29.3+/-0.5 yr and 14.3+/-0.3 g/dl, respectively. No subject noted GI symptoms during blood ingestion. Fecal blood levels (measured by HQ) were elevated within 2 days after initiation of blood ingestion and remained elevated until 2-3 days after cessation of blood ingestion. Mean fecal blood levels peaked at 2.1, 7.9, 8.0, and 13.5 (mg hemoglobin/g stool) in groups ingesting 5 ml/5 days, 10 ml/3 days, 10 ml/5 days, and 20 ml/3 days, respectively. The proportion of positive tests during and i…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
FIT is human-specific, not affected by dietary artifact, and detects primarily lower intestinal bleeding.
“FIT has been increasingly the FOBT of choice for CRC screening, as it is human-specific, not affected by dietary artifact, and detects primarily lower intestinal bleeding [3, 6, 7].”
From Novel Approach to Fecal Occult Blood Testing by Assay of Erythrocyte-Specific microRNA Markers (2017) · cites this paper as [7]
Cites
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Occult Gastrointestinal Bleeding
Rockey, D. C. (1999) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199907013410107 · Cited by 212 · see citing works
Self-citationNovel Approach to Fecal Occult Blood Testing by Assay of Erythrocyte-Specific microRNA Markers
Wu, C. W., Cao, X., Berger, C. K., Foote, P. H., Mahoney, D. W., Simonson, J. A., Anderson, B. W., Yab, T. C., Taylor, W. R., Boardman, L. A., et al. (2017) · Digestive Diseases and Sciences · doi:10.1007/s10620-017-4627-6 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
- Authors
- Rockey, D. C., Auslander, A., & Greenberg, P. D.
- Venue
- American Journal of Gastroenterology
- Published
- 1999-02
- Volume
- 94
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 344-350
- ISSN
- 0002-9270
- Cited by
- 42
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review