Cited by 197Clinical Nutrition and GastroenterologyPalliative Care and End-of-Life IssuesDysphagia Assessment and Management

Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: high mortality rates in hospitalized patients

Abuksis, Galia, Mor, Melli, Segal, Negba, Shemesh, Ilana, Plout, Shlomit, Sulkes, Jaqueline, Fraser, Gerald M., Niv, Yaron·2000·The American Journal of Gastroenterology

Abstract

Objective Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) is a widely used method for insertion of a gastrostomy tube in patients who are unable to eat but have a normally functioning gut. Complications have been described, especially in fragile, debilitated patients, and 30-day mortality rates of 4.1-26% have been reported. We assessed the outcome of PEG tube placement for inpatients and outpatients, based on morbidity, mortality, and long-term survival. Methods We reviewed the medical records of all patients who underwent PEG at our institution between January 1, 1995 and December 31, 1996. Four groups of patients were compared: Group 1, patients from nursing homes; Group 2, hospitalized patients; Group 3, hospitalized patients matched to Group 2 for diseases, except mental disorder, and not treated with PEG; and Group 4, the general hospital population matched for age. Results A total of 114 PEG tubes were inserted in 114 patients, 47 from Group 1, 67 from Group 2. Eighty-seven percent of patients in Group 1 underwent PEG because of dementia, versus 46% of Group 2 (p Conclusions Patients hospitalized with acute illness are at high risk for serious adverse events after PEG insertion and this procedure should be avoided.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2000.01672.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Several risk factors for early mortality after PEG insertion were identified, e.g. dementia, urinary tract infection, previous aspiration and diabetes.

    “Several risk factors for early mortality after PEG insertion were identified, e.g.dementia, urinary tract infection, previous aspiration and diabetes (132-136, 149, 156-159).”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 30 · Cited by 197

Authors
Abuksis, G., Mor, M., Segal, N., Shemesh, I., Plout, S., Sulkes, J., Fraser, G. M., & Niv, Y.
Affiliations
Tel Aviv University (IL)
Venue
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2000-01
Volume
95
Issue
1
Pages
128-132
ISSN
  • 0002-9270 (ISSN-L)
  • 1572-0241
OpenAlex
W2007837148
Cited by
197
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 18
FWCI
12.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The American Journal of Gastroenterology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › Dysphagia Assessment and Management
Keywords
percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy, 30-day mortality, hospitalized patients, nursing home residents, dementia, long-term survival, PEG complications, acute illness, feeding tube placement
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Cognition Disorders, Endoscopy, Enteral Nutrition, Female, Gastrostomy, Humans, Male, Nursing Homes, Retrospective Studies, Risk Factors, Comorbidity, Survival Rate, Hospital Mortality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review