Cited by 300Clinical Nutrition and GastroenterologyPalliative Care and End-of-Life IssuesDysphagia Assessment and Management

Survival analysis in percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy feeding: a worse outcome in patients with dementia

Sanders, D.S., Carter, M.J., D'Silva, J., James, G., Bolton, R.P., Bardhan, K.D.·2000·The American Journal of Gastroenterology

Abstract

Objective Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) feeding has been validated in specific clinical situations such as acute stroke with dysphagia and oropharyngeal malignancy. The perception that gastrostomy insertion is safe and technically simple has led to an increase in the demands for PEG insertion, encompassing clinical applications such as in patients with dementia, in whom its role has not been justified. The purpose of this study was to compare the mortality of patients with dementia who were fed by PEG to that of other subgroups of patients requiring gastrostomy feeding. Methods The study focused on a cohort of 361 consecutive patients requiring PEG feeding between August 1992 and July 1997 from two District General Hospitals (Rotherham District General Hospital and Doncaster Royal Infirmary) in South Yorkshire. A retrospective cohort survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier survival method and Cox proportional hazards analysis. Results In all patients requiring gastrostomy feeding there is a high initial mortality of 28% at 30 days. However, patients with dementia have a worse prognosis compared to other subgroups, with 54% having died at 1 month and 90% at 1 yr (log rank test p Conclusions This is the first demonstration in the United Kingdom that the mortality of patients with dementia who are fed by gastrostomy is considerable. Consequently, we may wish to advise against gastrostomy feeding in selected patients within this clinical setting.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2000.02079.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Several risk factors for early mortality after PEG insertion were identified, e.g. dementia, urinary tract infection, previous aspiration and diabetes.

    “Several risk factors for early mortality after PEG insertion were identified, e.g.dementia, urinary tract infection, previous aspiration and diabetes (132-136, 149, 156-159).”
  • Survival after PEG insertion very much depends on the indication and selection of patients.

    “However, survival very much depends on the indication and selection of patients (132-137).”

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 17 · Cited by 300

Authors
Sanders, D. S., Carter, M. J., D'Silva, J., James, G., Bolton, R. P., & Bardhan, K. D.
Affiliations
  • Doncaster Royal Infirmary (GB)
  • Royal Hallamshire Hospital (GB)
  • Rotherham General Hospital (GB)
Venue
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2000-06
Volume
95
Issue
6
Pages
1472-1475
ISSN
  • 0002-9270 (ISSN-L)
  • 1572-0241
OpenAlex
W1994431221
Cited by
300
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 27
FWCI
12.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The American Journal of Gastroenterology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › Dysphagia Assessment and Management
Keywords
percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy, dementia, mortality, prognosis, dysphagia, acute stroke
MeSH terms
Contraindications, Aged, Dementia, Endoscopy, Enteral Nutrition, Gastrostomy, United Kingdom, Humans, Middle Aged, Retrospective Studies, Cohort Studies, Proportional Hazards Models, Survival Analysis, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review